User talk:Omega Tyrant: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Reggie: This does not belong on my talkpage)
Line 90: Line 90:


:Also, telling you now, publicly telling others on IRC that you're gonna start shit with the admin who blocked you when your block ends (and encouraging them to do so), and coming here right away to follow through with it, is not a wise thing to do. I suggest you get off the computer for a bit before you earn yourself another block. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 20:42, 4 December 2013 (EST)
:Also, telling you now, publicly telling others on IRC that you're gonna start shit with the admin who blocked you when your block ends (and encouraging them to do so), and coming here right away to follow through with it, is not a wise thing to do. I suggest you get off the computer for a bit before you earn yourself another block. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 20:42, 4 December 2013 (EST)
==Reggie==
Please tell me, why do you wish to withhold this information? And why are you taking it so personal to the point of swearing/cursing? It is possible to talk about this without resorting to that you know.
But seriously, its valid information that could indeed be true, so why withhold it? Even as a form of trivia, it seems interesting enough to mention. I mean after all, this wiki has an article dedicated to a [[Project M|fan game]]. Why is a page dedicated to a fan game, that has no backing from any nintendo official (as far as i know), yet information regarding a legit game stated by someone who actually works for the company isn't?
I'm not trying to be sarcastic here, I honestly want to know your reasoning behind this. In the event it's not true, it makes interesting trivia and it gives people something to talk about. If it is true, then at least the wiki could take pride in the fact it helped the cause by promoting the thing via providing a link to the petition in question for people to sign.
Wouldn't it be nice knowing a character got into the game because its one fans actually worked together to get? Don't you want the wiki to be part of that? Again, in the event it is legit.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 23:37, 4 December 2013 (EST)
:Fan games have no backing from Nintendo but are released into the public. They are playable. They are not "fake" or hoaxes. Petitions as ridiculous as adding Reggie to a ''Smash'' game are clearly hoaxes, and if anything, deserves to be on the List of Rumors page and not on the main ''Smash 4'' page. Don't add it there until Omega Tyrant puts his comment here, however. --[[User:Timson622222|Timson622222]] ([[User talk:Timson622222|talk]]) 23:40, 4 December 2013 (EST)
::I dont see how it could be a Hoax, i mean has Reggie been known for that sort of thing? Yea he had joked about wanting to be in the game. But after he said that, he admitted to having been joking about it and moved on. So I believe if he had been joking this time, he would have followed up with an "''I'm joking guys.''" like last time.<br><br>I like to think it's the fans wish for him to actually be in the game that made Sakurai consider it. Wouldn't it be interesting if this was indeed true? It would be nice knowing that a character got into smash because it's something fans wanted, and worked together to get.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 23:45, 4 December 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 23:49, December 4, 2013

If someone leaves a comment asking me something, please do not answer them for me unless I'm clearly offline
Archives
Archives

1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13


I will brawl anyone that challenges me, regardless of their skill level. If you want to Brawl me, contact me here or on the IRC. If you do brawl me, be sure to have tourney rules set unless noted otherwise. I'm semi-active on IRC, and due to my inconsistent sleeping patterns, you can find me on there in the most unusual of hours.

If there's something you wish to speak to me in private with, and cannot catch me on IRC (or cannot use IRC for whatever reason), you can contact me on Skype (which you can ask here for the addresses of).

reverted change re: l cancelling

the gif you reverted has the links facing opposite directions. they also don't jump at the same time. the gif i used was made in dolphin, and every mewtwo jumps at exactly the same frame, and are facing the same direction. they also all jump as soon as possible, showing off the lag very well. it is a much beter gif than the link gif for shwoing land cancelling.

jus sayan —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJLO (talkcontribs) 13:41, September 23, 2013‎

While they may not be perfectly accurate, they show L-cancelling better than the one showing different types of lag cancelling. The one you uploaded could be used on the Aerial page or something (though that does have a lot of images filling up the page already; maybe some could be in a gallery?). Scr7Scr7 sig.png(talk · contribs) 15:51, 23 September 2013 (EDT)
so basically, if the IDJC part was cropped out, it would work? ill remake the link one later today. is links down air the laggiest air attack? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJLO (talkcontribs) 14:10, September 23, 2013‎
If you remove the IDJC, you'd have one Mewtwo short hopping, bair, then fast falling, and one doing a SHFFL bair. Yeah that shows L-cancelling quite well, though a more laggy aerial should be used. I'm not sure if Link's dair is the laggiest aerial, but it's laggy enough to demonstrate L-cancels. Scr7Scr7 sig.png(talk · contribs) 16:14, 23 September 2013 (EDT)

The direction they face is irrelevant, and the Links pretty much jump at the same time, a frame or two difference doesn't matter when the L-cancelled Link still clearly regains control considerably before the other Link. With your image, you could barely tell the difference between the Mewtwos, and the Double Jump Cancel is irrelevant. Also sign your comments with four tildes ~~~~ and use proper grammar/spelling.

Scr7, pay attention to the notice I have at the top, don't answer other users here unless I'm clearly offline. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 16:22, 23 September 2013 (EDT)

If you want to make the image better, here is what you can do:

  • Keep it as two Links, his down aerial shows off the effects of L-Cancelling better than any other attack.
  • Keep it in real time, to demonstrate better how it works ingame.
  • Have Links holding shield, to have an immediate and visible indicator that the Link can move again. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 16:39, 23 September 2013 (EDT)


this direction they face /is/ relevant, since you are trying to show something. visually, it is harder to compare than if they were facing the same direction. ill remake it with the suggestions youve given. sorry if i was easily upset. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJLO (talkcontribs) 15:03, September 23, 2013‎

No problem, that new image is great. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 06:54, 24 September 2013 (EDT)

Mario (SSBB)/Neutral attacks 1-3

Can you provide your thoughts on the merging of Mario's three SSBB neutral attacks into one page? Here is where the very large discussion has taken place. RoyboyX Talk 22:21, 23 September 2013 (EDT)

I really don't care whether jabs are all on one page or on separate pages. If I didn't respond by now after several proddings, it should be clear I have no interest in getting involved in it. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 06:47, 24 September 2013 (EDT)

toe-stepping

hey there, just wanted to apologize if i came off as hostile earlier. im new to this wiki and just really eager to contribute. add to that the fact that i have almost no brawl knowledge, and the result is what you saw before. so yeah, sorry if i stepped on any toes, but thats why i made a discussion post instead of a change. thanks for being patient. DJLO (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2013 (EDT)

It's fine, you didn't come off as hostile or anything to me. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 19:39, 26 September 2013 (EDT)

Two Questions:

  1. I noticed you were the one who proposed SW:NAME. And while it fortunately DID get a lot of support, doesn't being an admin give you the right to simply establish that policy right then and there, without going through all that proposal shit?
  2. Do you ever make videos with commentary?

Just curious! SmashBall104: Butter side down! 21:42, 4 November 2013 (EST)

User is probably inactive so he might not respond to you soon, so I'll answer your questions for you. First, any proposal can fail even if created by an admin (for example, one time OT was planning to delete user pages that were protected and it received mostly opposition). Second, I myself, have never seen any of his Youtube videos have commentary in them. He might put in some commentary in his videos some day in the future but he prefers not to as of right now. Dots (talk) MewtwoMS.png The Smiley 22:54, 4 November 2013 (EST)
Mmmm-kay, I get it. Anyways, sorry to bother an inactive person. Over and out! SmashBall104: It's Super Effective! 12:30, 5 November 2013 (EST)
See SW:ADMIN#Administrators are not kings. No, no one on the Wiki has the power to implement and enforce a policy because their say so.
And I have not made any yet. It's largely possible I will try it some time in the future. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 09:22, 7 November 2013 (EST)

I know you're not exactly "active"

...but why have you not commented on the PM debate? Are you just indifferent? Toomai Glittershine ??? Le Grand Fromage 11:11, 19 November 2013 (EST)

Pretty much that, and the fact everything to say has pretty much already been said. There's no consensus there I really oppose.
Also, I should be becoming a bit more active from this point, with school lightening up and having completed Y. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 11:27, 19 November 2013 (EST)

It's been awhile...

Um...why did you block my userpace, the Smash Arena, and the forums from me? I edit the wiki, and u still don't let me do anything :( Cherrim98Cherrim Box Sprite.pngTalk 20:06, 19 November 2013 (EST)

See this. If you want your probation to be removed, then just keep contributing constructively to the wiki, and then when it has been deemed that you reformed yourself, your probation will be removed. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 21:25, 19 November 2013 (EST)

Thank you :) Cherrim98Cherrim Box Sprite.pngTalk 21:29, 20 November 2013 (EST)

Test

Test. Primid B (talk) 09:07, 2 December 2013 (EST)

Cursing Sucks!

I can't believe you said a major curse!!!! I only accept "suck". Crapfully having a Retarded Xmas, Smashballz

SmashWiki is not censored
Additionally, as I told you on IRC;
"you shouldn't be on the internet in the first place then if you're 11 years old and don't want people cursing around you"
Also, telling you now, publicly telling others on IRC that you're gonna start shit with the admin who blocked you when your block ends (and encouraging them to do so), and coming here right away to follow through with it, is not a wise thing to do. I suggest you get off the computer for a bit before you earn yourself another block. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 20:42, 4 December 2013 (EST)