I will brawl anyone that challenges me, regardless of their skill level. If you want to Brawl me, contact me here or on the IRC. If you do brawl me, be sure to have tourney rules set unless noted otherwise. I'm semi-active on IRC, and due to my inconsistent sleeping patterns, you can find me on there in the most unusual of hours.
If there's something you wish to speak to me in private with, and cannot catch me on IRC (or cannot use IRC for whatever reason), you can contact me on Skype (which you can ask here for the addresses of).
reverted change re: l cancelling
the gif you reverted has the links facing opposite directions. they also don't jump at the same time. the gif i used was made in dolphin, and every mewtwo jumps at exactly the same frame, and are facing the same direction. they also all jump as soon as possible, showing off the lag very well. it is a much beter gif than the link gif for shwoing land cancelling.
jus sayan —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJLO (talk • contribs) 13:41, September 23, 2013
- While they may not be perfectly accurate, they show L-cancelling better than the one showing different types of lag cancelling. The one you uploaded could be used on the Aerial page or something (though that does have a lot of images filling up the page already; maybe some could be in a gallery?). Scr7 (talk · contribs) 15:51, 23 September 2013 (EDT)
- so basically, if the IDJC part was cropped out, it would work? ill remake the link one later today. is links down air the laggiest air attack? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJLO (talk • contribs) 14:10, September 23, 2013
- If you remove the IDJC, you'd have one Mewtwo short hopping, bair, then fast falling, and one doing a SHFFL bair. Yeah that shows L-cancelling quite well, though a more laggy aerial should be used. I'm not sure if Link's dair is the laggiest aerial, but it's laggy enough to demonstrate L-cancels. Scr7 (talk · contribs) 16:14, 23 September 2013 (EDT)
The direction they face is irrelevant, and the Links pretty much jump at the same time, a frame or two difference doesn't matter when the L-cancelled Link still clearly regains control considerably before the other Link. With your image, you could barely tell the difference between the Mewtwos, and the Double Jump Cancel is irrelevant. Also sign your comments with four tildes ~~~~ and use proper grammar/spelling.
Scr7, pay attention to the notice I have at the top, don't answer other users here unless I'm clearly offline. Omega Tyrant 16:22, 23 September 2013 (EDT)
If you want to make the image better, here is what you can do:
- Keep it as two Links, his down aerial shows off the effects of L-Cancelling better than any other attack.
- Keep it in real time, to demonstrate better how it works ingame.
- Have Links holding shield, to have an immediate and visible indicator that the Link can move again. Omega Tyrant 16:39, 23 September 2013 (EDT)
this direction they face /is/ relevant, since you are trying to show something. visually, it is harder to compare than if they were facing the same direction. ill remake it with the suggestions youve given. sorry if i was easily upset. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJLO (talk • contribs) 15:03, September 23, 2013
Mario (SSBB)/Neutral attacks 1-3
Can you provide your thoughts on the merging of Mario's three SSBB neutral attacks into one page? Here is where the very large discussion has taken place. RoyboyX Talk 22:21, 23 September 2013 (EDT)
toe-stepping
hey there, just wanted to apologize if i came off as hostile earlier. im new to this wiki and just really eager to contribute. add to that the fact that i have almost no brawl knowledge, and the result is what you saw before. so yeah, sorry if i stepped on any toes, but thats why i made a discussion post instead of a change. thanks for being patient. DJLO (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2013 (EDT)
Two Questions:
- I noticed you were the one who proposed SW:NAME. And while it fortunately DID get a lot of support, doesn't being an admin give you the right to simply establish that policy right then and there, without going through all that proposal shit?
- Do you ever make videos with commentary?
Just curious! SmashBall104: Butter side down! 21:42, 4 November 2013 (EST)
- User is probably inactive so he might not respond to you soon, so I'll answer your questions for you. First, any proposal can fail even if created by an admin (for example, one time OT was planning to delete user pages that were protected and it received mostly opposition). Second, I myself, have never seen any of his Youtube videos have commentary in them. He might put in some commentary in his videos some day in the future but he prefers not to as of right now. Dots (talk) The Smiley 22:54, 4 November 2013 (EST)
- Mmmm-kay, I get it. Anyways, sorry to bother an inactive person. Over and out! SmashBall104: It's Super Effective! 12:30, 5 November 2013 (EST)
- See SW:ADMIN#Administrators are not kings. No, no one on the Wiki has the power to implement and enforce a policy because their say so.
- Mmmm-kay, I get it. Anyways, sorry to bother an inactive person. Over and out! SmashBall104: It's Super Effective! 12:30, 5 November 2013 (EST)
I know you're not exactly "active"
...but why have you not commented on the PM debate? Are you just indifferent? Toomai Glittershine Le Grand Fromage 11:11, 19 November 2013 (EST)
- Pretty much that, and the fact everything to say has pretty much already been said. There's no consensus there I really oppose.
It's been awhile...
Um...why did you block my userpace, the Smash Arena, and the forums from me? I edit the wiki, and u still don't let me do anything :( Cherrim98 Talk 20:06, 19 November 2013 (EST)
Test
Cursing Sucks!
I can't believe you said a major curse!!!! I only accept "suck". User:Smashballs/Dsig