Forum:This has gone out of control...: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:That one shouldn't have been deleted. I'll restore it asap. There will always be a few missteps in things like this. Luckily we can fix it no harm done. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 08:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | :That one shouldn't have been deleted. I'll restore it asap. There will always be a few missteps in things like this. Luckily we can fix it no harm done. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 08:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Okay, thank you [[User:JtM|JtM =^]]] ([[User talk:JtM|talk]]) 08:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | ::Okay, thank you [[User:JtM|JtM =^]]] ([[User talk:JtM|talk]]) 08:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::I know. That's why me, being the author of the policy that's causing this bloodletting, and realizing that it needs some oversight from somebody who knows who is legit and who isn't, I think needs the powers of sysop to put this back on track because the admins are just deleting the stuff as it's tagged and not fact checking (which they shouldn't have to do) in order that I might supervise the project. Check out my [[SW:RFA#Semicolon|RfA]] and I apologize for my syntax. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 19:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:08, February 7, 2009
I personally think the cleanup of smasher namespace was a good idea, but why delete Vidjogamers smasher page? He is a well known Peach player and participates in tournaments. I don't understand why it was deleted. Maybe I'm just missing something. Well whatever it is, please tell me whats going on. JtM =^] (talk) 08:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- That one shouldn't have been deleted. I'll restore it asap. There will always be a few missteps in things like this. Luckily we can fix it no harm done. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 08:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- I know. That's why me, being the author of the policy that's causing this bloodletting, and realizing that it needs some oversight from somebody who knows who is legit and who isn't, I think needs the powers of sysop to put this back on track because the admins are just deleting the stuff as it's tagged and not fact checking (which they shouldn't have to do) in order that I might supervise the project. Check out my RfA and I apologize for my syntax. Semicolon (talk) 19:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
