User talk:Doc King/Made up Tier Lists/1st SmashWiki Brawl Tier List

Just a note to Doc King, you might want to be careful when making lists like these, as they might offend some users here. Mr. Anon teh awsome 02:14, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

No

(The below conversation happened while this was still a forum. As such, it is irrelevant now.)

Are pages like this acceptable on SmashWiki? I'm sorry, but I think that this isn't right, and doesn't belong on the Wiki. DP99 (CTE) 02:29, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

It's a forum...unless it's spam/very poorly thought out/completely pointless and irrelevant to Smash at all, it's OK. It's a made up tier list based on how we Brawl over wi-fi (I could've sworn me and Doc were tied for 2nd :D). What's so wrong about it? --HavocReaper'48 02:37, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

First of all, I agree with Salad: we need to stop with the tier list creations. Contemplancy charts are ok, but the tier lists are annoying. Second, putting Spam at the bottom is totally unnecessary. And it just doesn't feel right. Like who is he to dictate who's better than who at SSBB? You can maybe post tourney results, but not a tier list. DP99 (CTE) 02:42, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Um. About Spam. This Michael person came on IRC once and challenged us with his Kirby, and he spammed Stone and Final Cutter a lot (it's the fate of all noobs...). He didn't have a real user-name, so, yeah. Also, Doc has brawled us enough times to scale us in his own opinion if he wants to, he's not "dictating", really not much of a big deal. As for Salad's future policy proposal... I'm neutral on the case. --HavocReaper'48 03:02, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I didn't realize that about the spam, but I still think this page doesn't belong. But my opinion doesn't really matter here since my name isn't being used and yours is. DP99 (CTE) 03:30, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Exactly what does this forum accomplish. Forums should be important to more than just the OP... Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 03:32, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Why the heck am I at 5?-Ivy73 16:32, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

That's what I forgot to mention. It doesn't belong because it doesn't do anything. DP99 (CTE) 03:37, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

But this is in the made up tier lists section, so it's in the right place. Doc King (talk) 03:45, July 18, 2010 (UTC) and Havoc, it was a close 3rd for you.

Why do we have a made up tier lists section in the first place? I think I'm gonna post Salads SW:Notier proposal on there myself. DP99 (CTE) 03:49, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

So there's a place where ppl can put there made up tier lists in. And then ppl can comment on the lists. Doc King (talk) 03:54, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

But SmashWiki is not intended for Tier List making or foruming. You have more forum edits than you do mainspace edits. DP99 (CTE) 03:57, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

We are relaxing the standards on forum making, but not on the quality of OPs and posting. This fails the latter test. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 17:22, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

I'd thouht I'd be tied with Havoc this time. But you view Havoc as better in your brawls against him and me. But you never see Havoc use random, do you? Nor do you see brawls with me and OT or me and Havoc.:p--MegaTron1XD 04:47, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Well, your ok but you spam a little which makes you move down to middle tier. Doc King (talk) 15:45, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Well this is what I was talking about. It's one thing if you make tier lists of character's recoveries, but it's not a good idea to rank actual members of the wiki. Sir Anon the great 16:31, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Well, nobody's offended, so it's ok. Doc King (talk) 16:51, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

2nd BOTTOM!?!? Ok, that is just to low for me to handle. Zeldasmash 01:44, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Well, your kind of predictable to the point where ppl can outsmart you. Doc King (talk) 02:01, August 1, 2010 (UTC)