| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Smasher talk:CPU
Wait, that's it? He played at this one tournament, and then vanished? This article seems pretty sparse of info. --160.39.188.134 16:56, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
- He beat Ken at Evo 2008, thanks to the dumb idea that items should be on medium. He abused ROBs final smash en route to a rather controversial victory over Ken Hoang. Once items were banned in tourneys, he has made no noticeable impact to my knowledge. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 17:33, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Items were also used at EVO.thats not skill JtM =^] (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Controversy section?[edit]
Should there be a note concerning all the controversy CPU has gotten for beating Ken in a VERY controversial tournament? Also, I don't think the stages of the matches matter. capefeather (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't think CPU should've been on here, the only reason he beaten Ken was because he abused the Final Smash and items, and that's not skill it's a skill that noobs only use. If there was no items, Ken would've won, there might've also been a possible chance that he wouldn't have retiredfrom Super Smash Bros.--Ryou Seiji (talk) 14:58, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
- This is arguable. While CPU did abuse items, he abused them well. What I'm saying is, despite how over-powered the items are, CPU didn't win through chance. I agree Ken would have won without items, but that doesn't necessarily mean that Ken should be considered more skilled. It's like saying that a Meta Knight player would have won in a tourney if Norfair was legal, so he is more skilled than the other player who beat him. 124.171.84.193 02:29, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
