Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
Notices |
---|
The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/ClonedPickle
Result: Granted rollback. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 04:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
ClonedPickle[edit]
Hi everyone. I am ClonedPickle, and as this suggests, I am requesting for rollback. Although I did not start to become active until around December 2008, I have lately been not only been editing the pages more often but also have reverted quite a bit of edits that are either geared toward vandalism or irrelevant information, and rollback would certainly increase the number of reverts I have already. Believe me in this, I am not requesting for rollback to seem powerful, as I know that rollback is simply just adding another button for editing tools. Also, I would never vandalize any page whatsoever, I have not gotten in to trouble or violated any policies of the wiki, and I check the Recent Changes Box often because I'm on this wiki far more than I used to be. Also, I definitely would not lose my cool if there happened to be disagreements/insults, because I do know how to deal with stuff like that now (not like how I was three to four years ago). I was told I should consider running for rollback, so I decided to go for it. Feel free to leave your support or opposition below.
Thanks for reading. ClonedPickle 08:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Votes/Comments[edit]
- Strong Support I'm glad you took my advice. You have 25 reverts, and your active, responsible and reliable. Well done. GutripperSpeak
- Support It will be well deserved. Good work, Pickle. Toon Ganondorf (t c)
- Supports don't get much bigger - Gutripper. Plus, user has no record of violations and has made plenty of reverts. Blue Ninjakoopa 11:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Über support What everybody else said.Smoreking(T) (c) 13:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Slight support. Some reversions, a good faith editor. Miles (talk) 20:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support. This user seems particularly competent in addition to having a (comparatively) high number of reverts in addition to an even manner and no policy violations or other things like that. A good candidate ^^ Alice 21:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Miles and Alice. Friedbeef1Screech 22:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support ClonedPickle seems to be a user who can be trusted with rollback, mainly because ClonedPickle has numerous reverts. Y462 (T • C • E ) 23:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Slight Support Miles. Masterman 2009 03:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)