SmashWiki talk:What SmashWiki is not
credit
Loosely based off of Wikipedia:Wikipedia:NOT. Miles (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Psh, hardly needed. C. Hawk tells me this every three days. BALτʀο [ talk ] 00:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I have seen that before. And it's hardly my problem, now is it, if it's Clarinet Hawk telling me this. BALτʀο [ talk ] 00:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Could you clarify things on the forum part? I know what you mean, but it should be clear what you mean. It is going to be a policy, you know. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 03:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Considering the fact that CH edited it
I guess this is ready to go up?SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 20:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
- If one other sysop (excluding myself, the author) approves of it here, as it is, then yes, it becomes official. Miles (talk) 22:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
- Not true. I don't constitute a consensus. And I'm not ready to make this an administrative decision. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 23:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
All that said, if nothing comes up against this soon, I'll make it policy. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I don't think anybody's really going to page attention to this policy...Should we use {{Violation}} for this?Smoreking(T) (c) 15:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Fan stuff stiffening
I propose that the section on "SmashWiki is not fanon" be changed to the following:
SmashWiki covers the canon Smash series, not fanon or invented additions. While the existence of things such as fan fiction, machinima, and fan games should not be ignored, articles on specific creations do not have a place here.
Might need another sentence about unofficial terms being covered under SW:OFFICIAL, and not SW:NOT. Toomai Glittershine The Stats Guy 22:03, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. Miles (talk) 23:13, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
- I second the motion.L33t Silvie I see wat u did thar...