SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/ParaGoomba348
Result of Discussion: Request for adminship failed, mainly due to lack of experience. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 17:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
ParaGoomba348
I have wanted to be an admin since the day I first came. I think that I should be an admin because i edit pages, clean articles, and de-stub stubs. I feel that I would make a good admin because I never vandilize pages. Yes, I have made a few mistakes, but I will never do them again. I also think that SmashWiki is a wikia, not a place to be making joke pages. So I would delete joke pages. Also, no spam page would get through me. And pages with bad content or added bad content will be fized or deleted when I'm around. I would make SmashWiki a better place. I would ban all that make a joke page, spam, or nonsense. I make a lot of contributions, and i'm on a lot.
I would crush all the offensive content in the fist of steel, if i had it. I would make SmashWiki perfect, and if it becomes imperfect again, I will perfect it.
If you support me, that is a good choice. do you want an admin that would always keep joke pages on? Of course not! Thats why I'm the best choice. You choose me, you did not choose wrong.
Becoming an admin means a lot to me. It's better for me, admins, users, and SmashWiki. Vote for ParaGoomba348! ParaGoomba348 (talk) 02:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Major Oppose: You joined SmashWiki about 9 days ago, and you have only made 33 edits to the Main namespace. Also, in my opinion, the few edits that you have made just aren't that great. Try again after you make about a thousand more edits, and after a few months have passed. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 02:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Strong Oppose. You just haven't been here long enough. Your first edit was on June the 12th and there have not been that many since then. I understand that you don't like joke pages, but all of the admins currently working here don't like joke pages. Not only have you barely been on this wiki, you do not demonstrate how you standout from other users to be deserving of sysop privileges. Given the circumstances of this user, I'm going to move for a Speedy Close on this nomination. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 03:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Oppose! this was almost strong but because of what edits you have made they seem quite good. I can see you going places on this site, but you have been here for only 10 days. TEN DAYS. And you apparentely put this up on your 9th day. Again although you are one of my friends, it is just FAR TO EARLY for you to become a sysop. Maybe in a couple of months and next time you might get a support. Maybe will be a hit then! Kperfekt722 (talk) 07:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Strong Oppose. Sorry but you are way to new here. In fact, I didn't know about you until 2 days ago. JtM (talk) 08:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
I Vote Suppou. YEAH RIGHT! Massive Oppose You haven't done ANYTHING to deserve a chance of becoming a sysop you only joined a week ago. You have made little progress. Try agin in a few months and MAYBE you will get some support. Zmario (talk) 10:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Oppose. What they said ^^^^. Also, learn to type correctly. It'll help =] ItemHazard (talk) 19:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC) ItemHazard
Oppose I apologize, but I remember the day you joined, it wasn't that long ago. Clearly not enough time or experience.. (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 20:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC))
Should someone close this as all votes are oppose and no way even if he gets supports will they let him become one. Zmario (talk) 21:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'll give it until noon eastern time tomorrow. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 22:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
