| Archives | |
|---|---|
| Archive 1 | Awesome |
Let's talk about something. The Awesome 16:54, 27 June 2012 (EDT)
Cleanup tags
Sometimes they speak for themselves. A cleanup tag not having a reason for its placement is not an excuse to remove the cleanup tag, it obviously has a reason to be there, specified or not. Have a read through the articles you are de-cleaning, you might see why. Toast 
ltimatum
17:42, 2 October 2012 (EDT)
Mainspace edits
Hey, OT my mainspace edits are now on the top of the list. Does this means I'm out of the woods? The Awesome 18:07, 2 October 2012 (EDT)
- So I was right. You made several uneeded edits just so you could be able to edit your userpage over and over without worrying about probation. Just because you have 1 more mainspace edit than userpage edit doesn't mean you're off the hook you know. BlindColours
18:10, 2 October 2012 (EDT)
You know, I already had half a mind to hand you a one-day block for making scads of stub/cleanup tag edits, the vast majority of which had to be undone because they demonstrated complete and utter lack of comprehension as to what is a stub and/or what requires cleanup, and now you've basically admitted you only did it to drive down your userspace edit ratio. Consider this a warning. Toomai Glittershine 
The Xanthic 18:21, 2 October 2012 (EDT)
This edit
Don't touch things you don't understand, let alone destroy a heavily-used template. Toomai Glittershine The Metroid 18:25, 4 October 2012 (EDT)
Yo yo yo
Stop editin for a bit, OT will come along and tell you what's wrong with your edits in a few minutes. MegaTron1XD
14:00, 6 October 2012 (EDT)
Tip
Alright, I'm going to lay this out very simply for you.
Before you make an edit, think about whether the edit is absolutely necessary.
How does this, for example, improve the article? In this case, you are literally replacing a word with a synonym. Even minor edits like spelling and grammar fixing still help the article. You have been warned about this before. I am not an admin, so I am not in the position to call this a "last warning", but in my experience, users who ignore previous warnings and advice are not thought of very highly by the community. Mr. Anon
talk 18:04, 6 October 2012 (EDT)
It's clear that you are not thinking about your edits. Please take some time to think about your edits instead of just taking three seconds to perform the task without thought. Removing the speedy deletion tag was completely unnecessary and is most likely the result of you still not thinking about your edits. MegaTron1XD 18:53, 10 October 2012 (EDT)
- So that you actually know what you did wrong, I'll tell you. There was no reason on the D tag because it completely spoke for itself. Category:VIP Contributors had been replaced by Category:VIP contributots, with the capital letter lower-cased. But here's a handy hint; If you see a speedy delete tag on a page, there will be a reason, and if you question its place, ask somebody about it, don't just remove it. Toast ltimatum
18:59, 10 October 2012 (EDT) - Thank you toast for the tip. Next time I'll be a little bit more careful of my edits. The Awesome 19:15, 10 October 2012 (EDT)
Don't welcome users
Who have had an account for a long time and have already left the Wiki. Please, it's common sense. MegaTron1XD 19:05, 7 October 2012 (EDT)
"Needs more images"
...is an incredibly pointless and useless thing to say. If you think an article needs images, then explain what images you think it needs. Toomai Glittershine The Breegull 12:48, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
As I put in my edit summary
If three consoles were released in North America before Japan, then it's not notable trivia, as it does not apply to a big minority. Now allow me to remove your trivia, and don't revert me without providing a good reason. Toast ltimatum 16:36, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
Additionally, did you read this on your first talk page archive? [1] This doesn't just apply to stub tags, it applies to all tags. Toast ltimatum 16:38, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
"I'm not talking to you"
If a user answers your question, don't just ignore it because they weren't supposed to answer it. MegaTron1XD 21:51, 14 October 2012 (EDT)
- To clarify, while your question was indeed asked towards Air Conditioner, Mega was commenting on your tone and the way you were asking. That is legitimate feedback that you should pay attention to. In this specific case, Air Conditioner had already denied you your request. This is the internet, which means that simply saying "pleeeeaaaase?" only seems annoying to others. Mr. Anon talk 23:19, 14 October 2012 (EDT)
FYI
People calling you out for unconstructive and disruptive edits are not "users being mean here." Air Conditioner 
Goo goo g'joob. 12:15, 23 December 2012 (EST)
- I know. The Awesome 13:11, 23 December 2012 (EST)
- Then why did you say otherwise? Air Conditioner
All generalizations are false! 13:30, 23 December 2012 (EST)
- Then why did you say otherwise? Air Conditioner
The signature
Your signature has a mainspace image. They aren't allowed according to the Sign your comments#Images policy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ShupaRoeh (talk • contribs) {{{2}}}
This might seem random
But do you have any siblings? Air Conditioner Do this accurately, please. 20:55, 7 January 2013 (EST)
- Isn't that a violation of SW:TALK? Smash Master 20:58, 7 January 2013 (EST)
- You don't know the context, and I can't explain it right now. Air Conditioner Won't get fooled again! 20:58, 7 January 2013 (EST)
- ...And that was the context. Air Conditioner We were talking about the space between us all. 20:59, 7 January 2013 (EST)
- Now that... was random. Smash Master 21:03, 7 January 2013 (EST)
- Did you not see Recent Changes? Air Conditioner cares not for your petty signatures 21:06, 7 January 2013 (EST)
- Did you not see Recent Changes? Air Conditioner
- Now that... was random. Smash Master 21:03, 7 January 2013 (EST)
- ...And that was the context. Air Conditioner
- You don't know the context, and I can't explain it right now. Air Conditioner