|
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Result: User has been blocked, so this RfR has failed.
KP317
What up? I'm Kperfekt, but most of you probably know me as KP317, KP, or just K. So yeah, I'm requesting rollback rights, mainly due to the fact that we are getting way too many vandals, and because its the first step toward being on the top of this Wiki. May I also point out that bureacrats can revert my status at any time. What's that? You say you need even MORE information? Well, I'm the 8th biggest contributer to this site (that it's ever had), I'm pretty harsh with vandals and delete their works of stupidness fast, and this can just make it easier for me (and not flood the recent edits might i also add). Hmmm? MORE PROOF I'D MAKE A GREAT ROLLBACK?!?!? FINE! Check out any of the Wiki's listed at the bottom of my speech thingy, and then, once you cannot deny it any further, vote support or strong support for me. If that doesn't make me mature enough, maybe the fact that I just got my permit today, and the fact that I made this page does. Thank You! KP317 (talk) 22:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- manhunt.wikia.com - My Wiki (Over 20 Pages!)
- waverace.wikia.com - My Wiki
- iceclimber.wikia.com - My Wiki (Over 45 Pages!)
- kidicarus.wikia.com - My Wiki
- papermario.wikia.com - Bureacrat/Sysop
- starfox.wikia.com - Bureacrat/Sysop
- fzero.wikia.com - Top Contributer
Votes
Support. What the heck? You've been helpful. I'd say more, but typing with one hand (broken collarbone) wears me out. MarioGalaxy {talk} 22:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Weak Support. I disagree with your rambunctious behavior a lot of the time, but you do a lot around here and I don't think you would hurt anybody with rollback rights. However I am glad you gave me the opportunity to put this here first. Thus: your contribution status to this wikia:
- Mainspace - 572
- SmashWiki - 43
- Template - 19
- Smasher - 65
Not bad. Better than my own, but I'm not asking for rollback rights. This is what I mean by rambunctious, though.
- User talk - 1,196
I remember a little while back you mentioned that you had more contributions than C-Hawk, and I would also like to point out that in that you considered your enormous User Talk contributions. However, you work to help this wiki out, so I can't see a real reason not to grant them to you, particularly and very keenly because you're not looking for anything more potent than rollback rights. Semicolon (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose. Sorry, but you've demonstrated a complete lack of patience and professionalism both in your overall attitude and in this particular request. The ability to quickly revert another users edits should not be taken lightly, and I've seen you in to many edit wars recently to be comfortable making that easier for you. I'll also point out that bureaucrats cannot remove status that is granted to other users. They can only increase the status. Removing it requires contacting the wikia staff, and a whole long list of things that I'd rather never get into. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 22:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- I appologize about not realizing that. It doesn't change my stance on the matter, though. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Firstly, thank you semicolon, secondly, ask kirbyking. Bureaucrats CAN undo the rank of rollback, just not Sysop or Bureaucrat. KP317 (talk) 23:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Tbh, bug Wikia and you can do all 3. Osht. --Shadowcrest 02:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Result: Failed again due to user having no respect for policies or other users. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 05:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
KP317
What up? I'm Kperfekt, but most of you probably know me as KP317, KP, or just K. So yeah, I'm requesting rollback rights, mainly due to the fact that we are getting way too many vandals, and because its the first step toward being on the top of this Wiki. May I also point out that bureacrats can revert my status at any time. Well, I'm the 7th biggest contributer to this site, I'm pretty harsh with vandals and delete their works of stupidness fast, and this can just make it easier for me (and not flood the recent edits might i also add). Check out any of the Wiki's listed at the bottom of my speech, and then, once you cannot deny it any further, vote support or strong support for me. If that doesn't make me mature enough, maybe the fact that I made this page does. --KP317 (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- manhunt.wikia.com - My Wiki (Over 20 Pages!)
- waverace.wikia.com - My Wiki
- iceclimber.wikia.com - My Wiki (Over 45 Pages!)
- kidicarus.wikia.com - My Wiki
- papermario.wikia.com - Bureacrat/Sysop
- starfox.wikia.com - Bureacrat/Sysop
- fzero.wikia.com - Top Contributer
Votes
Support. "You're active and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 22:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose. Your fourth ban ended five days ago and one of the first things you did after getting back was tell every admin on the site not to talk to you. Then, you linked an admin to a site that contained personal attacks against him. Please, do us a favor and remove this request yourself. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 22:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Wouldn't that count as how he acts with people (social skill)? I thought that wasn't necessary, and I'm pretty sure Shadowcrest said something like that. Anyway, I'm not voting yet; I want to see how this turns out. MarioGalaxy {talk} 22:59, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- There's a difference between bad people skills and blatant disregard for the policies and administration. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 23:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Eh, point taken. But I just prefer not to take a side right now. KP got a little mad with me before his last ban, because I'm "aquainted" to you. Oh, and this is on a separate subject, but what about Shadowcrest's RfR? It's archived, but it doesn't say that he passed or failed. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- I passed. --Shadowcrest 23:07, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- I saw. I modified your edit, changing it from "promoted" to "Passed", since C. Hawk wrote it like that in the others. Anyway, this is going into a different subject, so let's just get back to Users voting. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- The remarks that CH made are exactly the reason I feel the way I do about the admins here. Secondly, I put up this request so soon because I had one up before I was banned (for no valid reasons). And Thirdly, I only listed 3 admins. Learn to read before making remarks as such again please. KP317 (talk) 23:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- What, that you've been blocked several times for breaches of policy, that your ban disqualifies you from consideration for any power? Come on. You've been nothing but disruption for all of your time on this wiki. The admins have acted within policy. You have not. Thus, you are teh banxored. Get over it, and yourself. Seriously. Oh, and Oppose. Semicolon (talk) 01:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- The remarks that CH made are exactly the reason I feel the way I do about the admins here. Secondly, I put up this request so soon because I had one up before I was banned (for no valid reasons). And Thirdly, I only listed 3 admins. Learn to read before making remarks as such again please. KP317 (talk) 23:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- I saw. I modified your edit, changing it from "promoted" to "Passed", since C. Hawk wrote it like that in the others. Anyway, this is going into a different subject, so let's just get back to Users voting. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- I passed. --Shadowcrest 23:07, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Eh, point taken. But I just prefer not to take a side right now. KP got a little mad with me before his last ban, because I'm "aquainted" to you. Oh, and this is on a separate subject, but what about Shadowcrest's RfR? It's archived, but it doesn't say that he passed or failed. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- There's a difference between bad people skills and blatant disregard for the policies and administration. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 23:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support. You're a very active contributor to the wiki, and your harshness towards vandals is a plus. Good luck, K. - GalaxiaD Talk 23:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Um, OK, well, that was innovative. Turning a minus into a plus. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Massive Oppose. Multiple bans, a list of Users he "has a problem with" and a volatile temper. Not a chance. Miles (talk - contribs) 03:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose. Even if KP317's attitude had absolutely nothing to do with how he would exercise rollback powers -- as harmless as Rollback generally is, it's still easily abuse-able by someone who, apparently, at least, has no respect for policy -- I would still oppose; Rollback isn't a "reward" per se, but it is a responsibility, particularly on a wiki where Rollback is a prerequisite (and thus a step closer toward) SysOption, and KP317 doesn't strike me as the responsible type. – Defiant Elements 03:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Result: Failed again, because the majority of the voters do not think that rollback powers are appropriate for Kperfect. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 13:24, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
KP317
I've been quiet. I haven't been causing trouble. Now then, can I please have a fair shot at this?
I'm Kperfekt, but most of you probably know me as KP317, KP, or just K. I'm requesting rollback rights, mainly due to the fact that we are getting way too many vandals, and because its the first step toward being on the top of this Wiki. May I also point out that bureacrats can revert my status at any time. Well, I'm the 7th biggest contributer to this site, I'm pretty harsh with vandals and delete their work fast, and this can just make it easier for me (and not flood the recent edits might I also add). I Really don't see the harm in giving me a chance. If this was a non-reversable decision, then yes, I could understand. But what harm could I REALLY DO? Bureaucrats come on this site every day, so even if I did "Cause harm to this Wiki", what damage could I actually do? In closing, I just wanna thank you for not immediately deleting this request. KP317 (talk) 05:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Votes/comments
- This is what, youre third time? lol you really want this badly. you've vandalized... I think... Im not quite sure what im for, ill wait till other people weigh in. Neutral JtM =^] (talk) 05:46, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Very poor temper; I have little confidence the tools would be used well. Miles (talk) 16:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- I would support, but has it been 4 months since your ban?SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 16:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- No, his last ban ended November 14th. So Kperfekt, you're ineligible anyway. Miles (talk) 16:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Just as a note, the four months is technically just for RfAs. Oppose any how. Just read his previously failed request. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 16:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. 1) Regardless of what you say, you've got a grand total of 3 reverts in the your last 500 edits, so even if we are getting too many vandals, I don't think you personally need Rollback rights. 2) Frankly, arguing that you deserve additional responsibility on the basis of "how much harm could I do?" is simply inane. 3) You want this way too badly in my opinion. 4) I don't trust you. 5) See my vote on KP's last Request for rollback. – Defiant Elements +talk 21:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Even though I haven't been on this wiki for a long time, I have been here long enough to know that you, KP, have a bad temper, not very responsible, and basically all of what DE said. Sorry. Friedbeef1 Argue 21:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I don't think so. --GutripperSpeak if you are worthy 06:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I've seen your bad attitude in action. Plus, you put your request under a level 2 header. It says at the top to use level 3. Baltro [ talk ] 00:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Fake support that's really oppose Sorry dude you just weren't meant for rollback. ParaGoomba348 02:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)- SUPER SUPER STRONG Support KP, you're a good friend. You really, really, REALLY deserve it. ParaGoomba348 03:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support You haven't flamed at anyone... in like EVAR! You at least deserve this status. Koopa Claus Happy Holidays 04:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's good to see you calm down, and I hope you remain so. But why do you desire rollback privileges so much? Many members lead full, productive lives without ever touching a mop. If it's prestige you seek, let me tell you, rollbackers and administrators are janitors, not Gym Leaders. You'll gain much more social standing by making excellent edits in the main namespace and remaining diplomatic with other users - in other words, making an impression as a regular user. – MaskedMarth (t c) 17:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but did you just oppose KP because you don't want him to have rollback powers? That's not a reason to oppose, SysOp or not.
Koopa Claus 20:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, it's the only reason you should oppose. He did give explanations as to why he didn't want him to have the powers. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 21:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't feel it necessary to repeat everyone else's reasons to oppose. – MaskedMarth (t c) 21:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but did you just oppose KP because you don't want him to have rollback powers? That's not a reason to oppose, SysOp or not.
Seeing As How I Have Like, 2 Supports... I'm Asking That This Nomination Be Closed. All I Asked For Was A FAIR Chance. Not One Immediately Deleted. And I Got One, So Thank You. KP317 (talk) 19:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Baltro, PG, and Gurtripper only opposed because a sysop did, but everyone else has a reason. Sorry, bro. =( Koopa
Klaus 19:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Who the hell is Gurtripper and Fried beef 1? "Handsome" Hollywood K. 22:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose:How dare you speak like that. This is the reason you get blocked BNK, and why you keep getting your applications keep getting rejected KP. --Toon GanondorfCHAT 09:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
You don't even know me, so shut up. lol You know why you ain't in a crew? Well, look at your butt-buddy's talk page. You whine and complain when you lose, and I don't believe crews accept crybabies. We both know you're only opposing because your RfA epically failed. I'm actually quite glad it did, honestly. You don't tell anyone what to do, got that? This is a wiki, not your house. For those who see this as a flame, well look carefully.... that's right. No swearing. And for God's sake, FyreNWater can take care of herself. You don't have to be under her nose with her talk page open on another tab. Srsly. Koopa Klaus 11:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)- Permission from MaskedMarth to slash out my trolling. Sorry TG. Blue Ninjakoopa Happy Holidays 22:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)