Talk:Shield break

For

I think the shield break article should be merged with Shield, because this information is much more useful when read along with the main shield information; the shield break is just an added effect of the shield, its not a seperate thing altogether. Also, it's a stub; the information missing is, understandably, that of the shield so it makes perfect sense to merge it right? -- Jackton^TALK 15:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Personally I think you have a good point, I think the articles should be merged.--MysteryHeff ~ Ike Rox Sox off ^{TALK ~ CONTRIBS} 11:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Merge- Read above.--MegaTron1XD 22:43, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

What Mega said. Doctor Pain 99 (CTE) 22:51, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

Name

If this article isn't going to be merged, shouldn't it be called Shield break instead of Shield Break?--Wolf rulez! The best! 11:09, 23 May 2011 (EDT)

Wow, I forgot I ever posted this, but... bump.--Wolf rulez! YESH! WOLF! 13:14, 23 June 2011 (EDT)

And again.-- PSIWolf (T • C • E) 10:10, 21 October 2011 (EDT)