Talk:Shield break

For

I think the shield break article should be merged with Shield, because this information is much more useful when read along with the main shield information; the shield break is just an added effect of the shield, its not a seperate thing altogether. Also, it's a stub; the information missing is, understandably, that of the shield so it makes perfect sense to merge it right? -- Jackton^TALK 15:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Personally I think you have a good point, I think the articles should be merged.--MysteryHeff ~ Ike Rox Sox off ^{TALK ~ CONTRIBS} 11:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Merge- Read above.--MegaTron1XD 22:43, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

What Mega said. Doctor Pain 99 (CTE) 22:51, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

Name

If this article isn't going to be merged, shouldn't it be called Shield break instead of Shield Break?--Wolf rulez! The best! 11:09, 23 May 2011 (EDT)

Wow, I forgot I ever posted this, but... bump.--Wolf rulez! YESH! WOLF! 13:14, 23 June 2011 (EDT)

And again.-- PSIWolf (T • C • E) 10:10, 21 October 2011 (EDT)

You don't need to ask us if you wanted to change that. Say when Toomai changed Vine spiral to Thorn helix, he had to consult Mr. Anon, as he would be completely renaming the article. This is just a grammatical fix, so go ahead and do it. ToastUltimatum Complaints Box 17:43, 21 October 2011 (EDT)

Merge?

Discuss. Dots The Cute Asian 20:11, 18 October 2012 (EDT)

A merge is fine, just make sure you keep the info, not just make a useless redirect--Brian^{Don't try me!} 19:44, 15 November 2012 (EST)

Merge I concur. Shield damage percentages are on Shield, so it would make sense to include Shield break on that. --RoyboyX Talk 19:46, 15 November 2012 (EST)