Talk:Blaster (Fox)
Merge
This was taken from a different talk page as it was said the topic/conversation is better suited here. The points listed are taken from said conversion that was almost a month ago. Wolff (talk) 23:41, April 23, 2019 (EDT)
Blasters
Series: Star Fox
User(s): Fox, Falco, and Wolf.
Among the reasons stated in the previous conversation to Merge: Same Name, Same Origin.
Among the reasons stated in the previous conversation to Split: Works differently.
- Note: Currently, the only moves to function the same with different names are Luigi's and Rosalina's Final Smashes in Ultimate. However, the reason for the name change was aesthetic. (Ultimate changed the appearance of what they used for their FS)
- Note 2: Those are also Final Smashes, not Special moves.
Aside from what has already been listed above, what other reasons could there be to split or merge them? Wolff (talk) 23:41, April 23, 2019 (EDT)
It been about a week. If no one appears to oppose the notion, should I just merge them? Wolff (talk) 21:24, April 28, 2019 (EDT)
Merge fox and Falco lasers
Keep Wolf’s as separate page Thegameandwatch (talk) 15:00, May 1, 2019 (EDT)
- But why not merge Wolf's as well? There's not much on Wolf's Blaster that would really warrant separation from Fox's and Falco's. If its differences, all three pages already list differences from each Blaster, probably because its the same move used by three different characters. Wolff (talk) 18:27, May 1, 2019 (EDT)
- Wolf’s blaster has a different model, different looking lasers, and a completely different animation. Falco’s Blaster was Fox’s in the first game. I personally think they should be separate, but I can understand the mentality of merging Falco’s but not Wolf’s. Lou Cena (talk) 19:13, May 1, 2019 (EDT)
- But models, lasers, and animations are all just aesthetics. All they change is how the move looks, not works. Wolff (talk) 20:14, May 1, 2019 (EDT)
- Doesn't Wolf's lasers fire a lot more slower and deal more damage, though? The change between his blaster's and Fox's/Falco's is a lot more bigger than the one between Fox's and Falco's. Crazy456Rhino (talk) 09:23, May 7, 2019 (EDT)
- The differences between wolf and fox's blaster is about the same kind of differences between Mario and Luigi's Fireball (which i may note do share a page) different looks and aesthetics, as well as different properties, but overall look and act pretty similar still and have the same name. Overall, despite having different properties, they are overall still similar enough to be deserving of the merge, especially since they are all 3 from the same series. Xtra
Talk Edits 10:28, May 7, 2019 (EDT)
- Saying that Fox and Wolf share the same neutral special because they shoot a gun is like saying that Samus and Snake share a side special because they both shoot missiles, or that Fox and Wolf also share a neutral special with Joker because they all have guns. Different models, different projectiles, different uses, different animations, I could go on. Lou Cena (talk) 13:07, May 7, 2019 (EDT)
- Moves that have the same name, but the users come from different series (regardless how similar it works) get separate pages, as is the case with the move "Thunder". We have Thunder (Pokemon) as there's more than one user from Pokemon (Pikachu & Pichu), and Thunder (Robin) as he is the only Fire Emblem character to use it. You can compare Samus and Snake's move from a technical standpoint, but not as the same move in terms of a page as the characters are from different series. Fox, Falco, and Wolf are all from Star Fox, and they each have a move called "Blaster". If not able to do the same combos and techniques with all three are a main concern, those tend to change depending on the installment (which can be noted). Other moves have had slight differences, but were/are enough to give them their own page as they had different names, similarly, despite others having more noticeable differences, they share the page as they have the same name and come from the same series.
- Why is name/universe a factor in keeping them merged? While it does make finding the page easier, this obviously isn't the first time two things in Smash (or even two moves) shared the same name, as you mentioned. Besides, keeping two or more moves in one page because they share the same name and are used are members of the same universe limits their possibility. As mentioned by several within this discussion, the differences between the blasters (especially Wolf's) are major enough to warrant their own pages. Relating to this, Mario's Fireballs should be separated from Luigi's, Richter's Holy Water should be separated from Simon's, etc. Unless if two moves are almost exactly the same and they share the same name, they should should be separated. It'll take a bit of work, but I feel like it would be best to keep these two split. Besides, Megavitamins has its own page, so... Crazy456Rhino (talk) 09:50, May 15, 2019 (EDT)
- As Xtra3678 mentioned, Xtra created a draft (User:Xtra3678/Blaster) on how it can/could look like if they get merged. If one does not like how it looks, then they try editing it in a way that make seance. (I would suggest looking at other moves with multiple users so it looks similar.) Wolff (talk) 14:30, May 7, 2019 (EDT)
- Moves that have the same name, but the users come from different series (regardless how similar it works) get separate pages, as is the case with the move "Thunder". We have Thunder (Pokemon) as there's more than one user from Pokemon (Pikachu & Pichu), and Thunder (Robin) as he is the only Fire Emblem character to use it. You can compare Samus and Snake's move from a technical standpoint, but not as the same move in terms of a page as the characters are from different series. Fox, Falco, and Wolf are all from Star Fox, and they each have a move called "Blaster". If not able to do the same combos and techniques with all three are a main concern, those tend to change depending on the installment (which can be noted). Other moves have had slight differences, but were/are enough to give them their own page as they had different names, similarly, despite others having more noticeable differences, they share the page as they have the same name and come from the same series.
- Saying that Fox and Wolf share the same neutral special because they shoot a gun is like saying that Samus and Snake share a side special because they both shoot missiles, or that Fox and Wolf also share a neutral special with Joker because they all have guns. Different models, different projectiles, different uses, different animations, I could go on. Lou Cena (talk) 13:07, May 7, 2019 (EDT)
- The differences between wolf and fox's blaster is about the same kind of differences between Mario and Luigi's Fireball (which i may note do share a page) different looks and aesthetics, as well as different properties, but overall look and act pretty similar still and have the same name. Overall, despite having different properties, they are overall still similar enough to be deserving of the merge, especially since they are all 3 from the same series. Xtra
- Doesn't Wolf's lasers fire a lot more slower and deal more damage, though? The change between his blaster's and Fox's/Falco's is a lot more bigger than the one between Fox's and Falco's. Crazy456Rhino (talk) 09:23, May 7, 2019 (EDT)
- But models, lasers, and animations are all just aesthetics. All they change is how the move looks, not works. Wolff (talk) 20:14, May 1, 2019 (EDT)
- Wolf’s blaster has a different model, different looking lasers, and a completely different animation. Falco’s Blaster was Fox’s in the first game. I personally think they should be separate, but I can understand the mentality of merging Falco’s but not Wolf’s. Lou Cena (talk) 19:13, May 1, 2019 (EDT)
There is also a draft of what the merged blasters page would look like (can be found at User:Xtra3678/Blaster), and the current draft keeps literally all of the wolf information on wolfs page, in its own seperate heading, keeping all the current information and not messing up anything. It could even be improved in order to show how it is still a very different projectile from the other 2 starfox charecters, however in its current state there should be no problems with the move being "too different to share a page" because it clearly shows off its differences in the draft page.Xtra
Talk Edits 10:41, May 7, 2019 (EDT)
Merge fox and Falco’s blaster and keep wolf blaster as it’s on page Thegameandwatch (talk) 17:18, May 8, 2019 (EDT)
- Quoting myself from before: "But why not merge Wolf's as well? There's not much on Wolf's Blaster that would really warrant separation from Fox's and Falco's. If its differences, all three pages already list differences from each Blaster, probably because its the same move used by three different characters." Wolff (talk) 21:10, May 8, 2019 (EDT)
- As I said before, Falco’s and Fox’s blasters use the same model for the gun and the laser. Wolf’s looks nothing like either of theirs, both the model and the laser, and all act very differently as well. If the issue is that they have the same origin, Wolf’s doesn’t even have one. Fox and Falco use blasters that look similar to those from Star Fox 64. Wolf’s was created solely for for Smash bros. I’m neutral for merging Falco’s and Fox’s, but Wolf’s blaster is one of the worst things to suggest a merge for. Lou Cena (talk) 21:24, May 8, 2019 (EDT)
- Like I mentioned before, the differences of the "models" are just aesthetic, which just a visual difference. (I feel we're beginning to go in circles) The Blasters in Smash 4 have different customs but they are still the same move. Although they have different custom names, so do Link and Toon Link's bombs which are on the same page and are considered the same move. In the case with Origin, it does not seem to matter if Wolf's has no Origin in comparison as it seems that Wolf's Blaster is just based on Fox's (plus its currently just copy pasted information on the page). Wolff (talk) 22:17, May 8, 2019 (EDT)
- As I said before, Falco’s and Fox’s blasters use the same model for the gun and the laser. Wolf’s looks nothing like either of theirs, both the model and the laser, and all act very differently as well. If the issue is that they have the same origin, Wolf’s doesn’t even have one. Fox and Falco use blasters that look similar to those from Star Fox 64. Wolf’s was created solely for for Smash bros. I’m neutral for merging Falco’s and Fox’s, but Wolf’s blaster is one of the worst things to suggest a merge for. Lou Cena (talk) 21:24, May 8, 2019 (EDT)
- So what your saying is that you think the 1 laser blaster looks different from the other laser blaster, and has a slower laser but other than that is mostly identical in origin, origin series, name, how you use it, and generally the way it is portrayed in smash, and has also been proven to be reliably able to show differences if put on the same page as the other blaster due to the draft, and yet you still think these 2 moves are radically and instrumentally different and would be "one of the worst things to suggest a merge for" despite all the shown reasons to be merged. It doesn't add up. the reasons you have supplied are greatly outweighed by the reasons to do the merge. Please just look at User:Xtra3678/Blaster for one second and then look at Blaster (Wolf) and please tell me what's so different between the 2 that makes it such a bad decision. XtraTalk Edits 00:04, May 9, 2019 (EDT)
- I did read the draft. I stated this when the original merge proposal was happening, and I’ll say it again: why would I want Fox and Falco’s advanced techniques if I’m trying to search up something for Wolf? Why would I want to know about their customs and throws if Wolf has none of that? And I already talked about how you wanted them merged because they “share” an origin. Except they actually don’t. Wolf’s blaster was created specifically for Brawl, which is evident by its gigantic overhaul in Ultimate. Fox and Falco use actual designs and lasers from the Star Fox games. Lou Cena (talk) 01:15, May 9, 2019 (EDT)
- So what your saying is that you think the 1 laser blaster looks different from the other laser blaster, and has a slower laser but other than that is mostly identical in origin, origin series, name, how you use it, and generally the way it is portrayed in smash, and has also been proven to be reliably able to show differences if put on the same page as the other blaster due to the draft, and yet you still think these 2 moves are radically and instrumentally different and would be "one of the worst things to suggest a merge for" despite all the shown reasons to be merged. It doesn't add up. the reasons you have supplied are greatly outweighed by the reasons to do the merge. Please just look at User:Xtra3678/Blaster for one second and then look at Blaster (Wolf) and please tell me what's so different between the 2 that makes it such a bad decision. Xtra
I strongly oppose any ideas of merging these pages again. We agreed to separate them several years ago, after several years of them being bunched together. "Looks similar, used in similar fashion" does not justify sticking three mechanically-different moves on the same page. By that logic, we should put every counter on the same page, as well as merging Dancing Blade/Double-Edge Dance and Palutena's Bow/Silver Bow together. The mistake we made several years ago was not going a step further and separating Mario and Luigi's respective Fireballs and all other moves with mechanical differences that are still merged. The only moves I can see being on the same page are moves shared between Echo Fighters, but even that's a stretch, if you ask me. It's not like we need to condense these pages for lack of server space. John 
HUAH! 00:51, May 9, 2019 (EDT)
- Are some you people not even reading what is being said? Given the info provide by both sides, I say merge them all. From where I see it, the splitters are ignoring what the mergers are saying and repeating the same information despite already being answered! (argumentum ad nauseam) I don’t mean to upset, but please read the info provided and use it in the argument instead of only repeating yourselfs! I’m sorry, but regardless of what I said and assume is true, non of the reasoning said by the splitters for splitting makes any sense to me whatsoever. I really don’t mean to come off as annoye or rude, but I felt I needed to say something about this. Have a nice day otherwise. 208.54.85.240 02:19, May 9, 2019 (EDT)
- I have read everything that was said, thank you very much. Suggesting that the splitters are ignoring the mergers' points is not constructive to the argument, since the same claim can be made the other way around since there is not consensus on this issue. I'm in agreement with Lou Cena here for the most part, and I would say that it should require a large consensus either way to change anything, since there is no sign of compromise. John
HUAH! 00:00, May 10, 2019 (EDT)
- I have read everything that was said, thank you very much. Suggesting that the splitters are ignoring the mergers' points is not constructive to the argument, since the same claim can be made the other way around since there is not consensus on this issue. I'm in agreement with Lou Cena here for the most part, and I would say that it should require a large consensus either way to change anything, since there is no sign of compromise. John
Considering we keep repeating the same information to the point that neither side is currently able to convince other, I suggest that those of us who have already stated our opinions (including myself) should wait until more people join the discussion. Perhaps then, more options will come up from new opinions. Wolff (talk) 18:49, May 12, 2019 (EDT)
