Talk:Reddit: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:


'''Neutral'''; I'd imagine it'd be more practical to have a single page with links and descriptions for minor Smash community sites such as Reddit and Nsider2. [[User:Shredster7|Shredster VII]] ([[User talk:Shredster7|talk]]) 21:42, 2 July 2014 (EDT)
'''Neutral'''; I'd imagine it'd be more practical to have a single page with links and descriptions for minor Smash community sites such as Reddit and Nsider2. [[User:Shredster7|Shredster VII]] ([[User talk:Shredster7|talk]]) 21:42, 2 July 2014 (EDT)
Bump. [[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 17:19, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:19, July 4, 2014

Delete: Reason stated on page. DoctorPain99 18:26, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

Keep The subreddit has over 10,000 subscribers, lots of action within the community takes place there, and many top players use it frequently. Awesome Cardinal 2000 20:20, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

So? Many top players use twitter. Lots of action in the community takes place there. We have no article on Twitter, and shouldn't have an article on Twitter. This is no more relevant. DoctorPain99 20:28, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
Neutral leaning towards support. Unlike Twitter, this is dedicated to SSB, while Twitter is dedicated to posting short messages about almost anything. Red (talk) Red 20:45, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

Delete, per DP99's reasoning and reason in notice on page. DarkFox01DF01Sig.png[The Editor Formerly Known as MeleeMarth01] 20:47, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

Delete, Page is almost blank as it is, and it seems like this doesn't need a page. Laikue (talk) 18:55, 27 June 2014 (EDT)

I haven't formed an opinion yet, but claiming to delete a page because it "is almost blank" is a completely invalid reason to delete a page.
--- Monsieur Crow, Author Extraordinaire, 19:00, 27 June 2014 (EDT)
Not necessarily. It's very unlikely that this page can be expanded upon. Perhaps we can link to Reddit posts in some places, but that's about it. I say we delete it for the reason DP stated. blue ninjakoopa 19:30, 27 June 2014 (EDT)

From what I've seen, the Smash community on Reddit is very popular and active, which puts it in our spectrum. I say Keep. Toast Wii U Logo Transparent.pngltimatum 19:32, 27 June 2014 (EDT)

Keep, Reddit is huge and a tiny bit of work has been done on the main page anyway. Seems a shame to delete it because some sites are too small/insignificant to get an article. --ZestyLemon (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2014 (EDT)

Keep The arguments above already stated summarize my opinion. RoyboyX Talk 17:15, 28 June 2014 (EDT)

I'll say keep as well. We could expand it a bit like we did with the Twitch article. Also, the Smash community there is indeed popular, so we can talk about its relevance. Berrenta (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2014 (EDT)

Those who say delete, do you have any arguments why this can't be expanded? RoyboyX Talk 20:27, 30 June 2014 (EDT)

There isn't any content to add to the article about Reddit's smash community other than "X said this and it was funny/a lot of people liked it." What have they done that's so significant that an article needs to be made for the host site? blue ninjakoopa 20:36, 30 June 2014 (EDT)

Neutral; I'd imagine it'd be more practical to have a single page with links and descriptions for minor Smash community sites such as Reddit and Nsider2. Shredster VII (talk) 21:42, 2 July 2014 (EDT)

Bump. RoyboyX Talk 17:19, 4 July 2014 (EDT)