SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/KP317

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Result: User has been blocked, so this RfR has failed.

KP317

What up? I'm Kperfekt, but most of you probably know me as KP317, KP, or just K. So yeah, I'm requesting rollback rights, mainly due to the fact that we are getting way too many vandals, and because its the first step toward being on the top of this Wiki. May I also point out that bureacrats can revert my status at any time. What's that? You say you need even MORE information? Well, I'm the 8th biggest contributer to this site (that it's ever had), I'm pretty harsh with vandals and delete their works of stupidness fast, and this can just make it easier for me (and not flood the recent edits might i also add). Hmmm? MORE PROOF I'D MAKE A GREAT ROLLBACK?!?!? FINE! Check out any of the Wiki's listed at the bottom of my speech thingy, and then, once you cannot deny it any further, vote support or strong support for me. If that doesn't make me mature enough, maybe the fact that I just got my permit today, and the fact that I made this page does. Thank You! KP317 (talk) 22:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

• manhunt.wikia.com - My Wiki (Over 20 Pages!)
• waverace.wikia.com - My Wiki
• iceclimber.wikia.com - My Wiki (Over 45 Pages!)
• kidicarus.wikia.com - My Wiki
• papermario.wikia.com - Bureacrat/Sysop
• starfox.wikia.com - Bureacrat/Sysop
• fzero.wikia.com - Top Contributer

Votes

Support. What the heck? You've been helpful. I'd say more, but typing with one hand (broken collarbone) wears me out. MarioGalaxy {talk} 22:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Weak Support. I disagree with your rambunctious behavior a lot of the time, but you do a lot around here and I don't think you would hurt anybody with rollback rights. However I am glad you gave me the opportunity to put this here first. Thus: your contribution status to this wikia:

• Mainspace - 572
• SmashWiki - 43
• Template - 19
• Smasher - 65

Not bad. Better than my own, but I'm not asking for rollback rights. This is what I mean by rambunctious, though.

• User talk - 1,196

I remember a little while back you mentioned that you had more contributions than C-Hawk, and I would also like to point out that in that you considered your enormous User Talk contributions. However, you work to help this wiki out, so I can't see a real reason not to grant them to you, particularly and very keenly because you're not looking for anything more potent than rollback rights. Semicolon (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. Sorry, but you've demonstrated a complete lack of patience and professionalism both in your overall attitude and in this particular request. The ability to quickly revert another users edits should not be taken lightly, and I've seen you in to many edit wars recently to be comfortable making that easier for you. I'll also point out that bureaucrats cannot remove status that is granted to other users. They can only increase the status. Removing it requires contacting the wikia staff, and a whole long list of things that I'd rather never get into. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 22:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I appologize about not realizing that. It doesn't change my stance on the matter, though. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Firstly, thank you semicolon, secondly, ask kirbyking. Bureaucrats CAN undo the rank of rollback, just not Sysop or Bureaucrat. KP317 (talk) 23:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Tbh, bug Wikia and you can do all 3. Osht. --Shadowcrest 02:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

KP317

What up? I'm Kperfekt, but most of you probably know me as KP317, KP, or just K. So yeah, I'm requesting rollback rights, mainly due to the fact that we are getting way too many vandals, and because its the first step toward being on the top of this Wiki. May I also point out that bureacrats can revert my status at any time. Well, I'm the 7th biggest contributer to this site, I'm pretty harsh with vandals and delete their works of stupidness fast, and this can just make it easier for me (and not flood the recent edits might i also add). Check out any of the Wiki's listed at the bottom of my speech, and then, once you cannot deny it any further, vote support or strong support for me. If that doesn't make me mature enough, maybe the fact that I made this page does. --KP317 (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

• manhunt.wikia.com - My Wiki (Over 20 Pages!)
• waverace.wikia.com - My Wiki
• iceclimber.wikia.com - My Wiki (Over 45 Pages!)
• kidicarus.wikia.com - My Wiki
• papermario.wikia.com - Bureacrat/Sysop
• starfox.wikia.com - Bureacrat/Sysop
• fzero.wikia.com - Top Contributer

Votes

Support. "You're active and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 22:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. Your fourth ban ended five days ago and one of the first things you did after getting back was tell every admin on the site not to talk to you. Then, you linked an admin to a site that contained personal attacks against him. Please, do us a favor and remove this request yourself. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 22:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Wouldn't that count as how he acts with people (social skill)? I thought that wasn't necessary, and I'm pretty sure Shadowcrest said something like that. Anyway, I'm not voting yet; I want to see how this turns out. MarioGalaxy {talk} 22:59, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

There's a difference between bad people skills and blatant disregard for the policies and administration. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 23:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Eh, point taken. But I just prefer not to take a side right now. KP got a little mad with me before his last ban, because I'm "aquainted" to you. Oh, and this is on a separate subject, but what about Shadowcrest's RfR? It's archived, but it doesn't say that he passed or failed. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

I passed. --Shadowcrest 23:07, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

I saw. I modified your edit, changing it from "promoted" to "Passed", since C. Hawk wrote it like that in the others. Anyway, this is going into a different subject, so let's just get back to Users voting. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

The remarks that CH made are exactly the reason I feel the way I do about the admins here. Secondly, I put up this request so soon because I had one up before I was banned (for no valid reasons). And Thirdly, I only listed 3 admins. Learn to read before making remarks as such again please. KP317 (talk) 23:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

What, that you've been blocked several times for breaches of policy, that your ban disqualifies you from consideration for any power? Come on. You've been nothing but disruption for all of your time on this wiki. The admins have acted within policy. You have not. Thus, you are teh banxored. Get over it, and yourself. Seriously. Oh, and Oppose. Semicolon (talk) 01:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Support. You're a very active contributor to the wiki, and your harshness towards vandals is a plus. Good luck, K. - GalaxiaD ^Talk 23:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Um, OK, well, that was innovative. Turning a minus into a plus. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Massive Oppose. Multiple bans, a list of Users he "has a problem with" and a volatile temper. Not a chance. Miles (talk - contribs) 03:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. Even if KP317's attitude had absolutely nothing to do with how he would exercise rollback powers -- as harmless as Rollback generally is, it's still easily abuse-able by someone who, apparently, at least, has no respect for policy -- I would still oppose; Rollback isn't a "reward" per se, but it is a responsibility, particularly on a wiki where Rollback is a prerequisite (and thus a step closer toward) SysOption, and KP317 doesn't strike me as the responsible type. – Defiant Elements 03:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)