Talk:Edgehogging: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Iron Warrior (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Strong oppose'''. Can you stop with the pointless article renaming? A redirect with the proposed name already exists, why the heck do we need this? [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 19:12, 27 February 2018 (EST) | '''Strong oppose'''. Can you stop with the pointless article renaming? A redirect with the proposed name already exists, why the heck do we need this? [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 19:12, 27 February 2018 (EST) | ||
:Articles are to be named by their primary topic, which means the term most commonly used for the phrase. In this case, I've seen "Edgehogging" spelled more commonly without a dash (SmashWiki is the only place I've ever seen it spelled with a dash). Just because a redirect exists does not mean this article needs to stay where it is; in many cases the redirect should actually be the correct title. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 19:56, 27 February 2018 (EST) | :Articles are to be named by their primary topic, which means the term most commonly used for the phrase. In this case, I've seen "Edgehogging" spelled more commonly without a dash (SmashWiki is the only place I've ever seen it spelled with a dash). Just because a redirect exists does not mean this article needs to stay where it is; in many cases the redirect should actually be the correct title. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 19:56, 27 February 2018 (EST) | ||
'''Oppose'''. There is absolutely no point in renaming an article when the name works both ways and the page has a redirect with the name in question. [[User:Iron Warrior|<span style="color: green;">'''St. Reggie,'''</span>]] [[User talk:Iron Warrior|<span style="color: green;">'''Leprachaun'''</span>]] 23:42, 27 February 2018 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 23:42, February 27, 2018
Move proposal
Strong oppose. Can you stop with the pointless article renaming? A redirect with the proposed name already exists, why the heck do we need this? Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 19:12, 27 February 2018 (EST)
- Articles are to be named by their primary topic, which means the term most commonly used for the phrase. In this case, I've seen "Edgehogging" spelled more commonly without a dash (SmashWiki is the only place I've ever seen it spelled with a dash). Just because a redirect exists does not mean this article needs to stay where it is; in many cases the redirect should actually be the correct title. Awesome Cardinal 2000 19:56, 27 February 2018 (EST)
Oppose. There is absolutely no point in renaming an article when the name works both ways and the page has a redirect with the name in question. St. Reggie, Leprachaun 23:42, 27 February 2018 (EST)
