SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/MysteryHeff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was failed. Non-bureaucrat closure. --Sky (t · c · w) 03:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

MysteryHeff (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)

Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.

Hi I'm MysteryHeff I love SSB and also love this wiki. I contribute almost every day and I am on at least once a day. I don't have a stack of edits but I still have a few (most of which are MAJOR edits), and I also know what to edit and when to edit it. I also think this wiki could do with a couple more admins and I have been asked by friends to nominate myself. I am also an extremely friendly and easy to get along with person, which makes it abit easier to solve certain conflict.

I think I would make a good admin for this wiki because:

• I come on at least once a day.
• I'm an active user.
• I'm friendly and easy to get along with.
• I know how to use wiki's exceptionally well.
• I can make minor edits and fix up spelling mistakes well because I'm a good speller.
• I can help people if they need it.
• I've created at least one article.
• I may not have a huge amount of edits but most of them are major.

If you have any questions or comments for me please post them on my talk page and I will get back to you A.S.A.P.

Thanks.

Support

• Slight Support - i think that MysteryHeff would actually make a pretty good admin, but like me, he needs to get some more edits on pages. i woill definitly vote for you for Rollback if you decide after 100-500 edits on this wiki. good luck =D Ssbb legend Is in! 20:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

• Oppose. Youre too new, you dont seem to have used time previously to try to revert vandalism. Why would you now? JtM =^] (talk) 05:04, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. Same as SSBB Legend, you're too inexperienced here. I'd suggest waiting a month or so, whilst showing the community what you can contribute. Once you feel ready, run for rollback. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 05:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. Basically all you've edited is your User page. You've shown no reason that you should be an admin. I'd suggest waiting much more than a month. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 05:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

I meant before running for rollback. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 05:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

• Read above --Shadowcrest 15:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. See C. Hawk. – Defiant Elements +talk 16:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. See C. Hawk. Masterman Happy Holidays!! 20:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. Inexperienced; come back much later and I'd think about it, but not yet. Miles (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. ^Clarinet Hawk Friedbeef1 Ho ho ho! 21:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. C.Hawk. I think we need to have some sort of requirement to avoid things like this and SSBB legend dude. >_>.SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 22:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. ^ C. Hawk. Baltro [ talk ] 01:08, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose Sorry mate, but you're far too inexperianced, and there are way too many users with lots of edits and experiance who deserve it more. --Toon Ganondorf^CHAT 01:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

• ...

---