Talk:Main Page/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 42: Line 42:


So, should I go ahead and make the template? <span style="color:#4CBB17">--Posted by</span> [[User:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">Pikamander2</span>]] <small>[[User Talk:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">(Talk)</span>]]</small> at 13:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
So, should I go ahead and make the template? <span style="color:#4CBB17">--Posted by</span> [[User:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">Pikamander2</span>]] <small>[[User Talk:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">(Talk)</span>]]</small> at 13:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
: This is not the place to discuss potential new templates, this is the talk page for the Main Page. That said, the colors on the template make it pretty unreadable. I don't like the idea of using colors for the sake of making things colorful; we should have a system like Wikipedia where the colors associated with each template have some sort of meaning (distinguishing, for example, "this article can be enhanced" vs. "this article is lacking important details" vs. "this article is factually incorrect") --[[User:Kirby King|<font color="red"><b><i>Kirby King</i></b></font>]] 00:47, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
== Spelling ==
== Spelling ==



Revision as of 19:47, August 17, 2008

Notice Use this page to discuss design and content changes to the Main Page. For general wiki discussion, please visit the Community Portal or post in the forums. Click here to discuss SmashWiki's Article of the Week. Click here to discuss the main page's Did you know section.
Archives
Archives

1 2 3

New Template

I think that we need a template saying that an article needs an image. Or more images than it currently has. Here is a template that I made:

This article is in need of more or better images
If you have a good image for this article, please upload it at Special:Upload





The bottom of the template will have {{{doc|[[Category:Articles in need of images|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}} , so that the page will be added to [[Category:Articles in need of images]].

It may need some different wording, and a different image. What do you think?

--Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 17:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, I like the idea, and it is something wikipedia does. Let's just be careful that the images that get added are relevant and good quality. Also, we don't need six different pictures of the same attack hitting different characters on different stages. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 15:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

So, should I go ahead and make the template? --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 13:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

This is not the place to discuss potential new templates, this is the talk page for the Main Page. That said, the colors on the template make it pretty unreadable. I don't like the idea of using colors for the sake of making things colorful; we should have a system like Wikipedia where the colors associated with each template have some sort of meaning (distinguishing, for example, "this article can be enhanced" vs. "this article is lacking important details" vs. "this article is factually incorrect") --Kirby King 00:47, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Spelling

Hi. I'd just like to comment about the spelling on the main page. The main page is the first thing new visitors see when they enter this site. If many words are spelled incorrectly, the new visitor may already have a bad impression of the site. I'm talking about the "Note to all Users" section, in which many words are spelled wrong. I'm just asking that when you edit the main page, make sure you spell words right. Thanks! swannie Globeicon.png talk 02:49, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Here's a idea: Next time actually say what words are misspelled. Oh, and last time I check one is not equal to many. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 19:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
You also spelled "Temporarily" wrong. Sorry for any confusion, not trying to start a fight. swannie Globeicon.png talk 02:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Featured Article (Pikachu)

It says he's the only Pokemon aside from Jigglypuff to appear in all three games, but Charizard did, too. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 08:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Charizard isn't playable until Brawl. That was the point of the comment. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 13:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Okay. But it quite clearly says appear; nothing about playability. As it is now, it's wrong. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 14:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)