SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Ssbb legend is in

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Failed. Non bureaucrat closure. --Sky (t · c · w) 03:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Ssbb legend is in (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)

Please direct all discussions to the talk page.

Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.

Hi, my name is Ssbb legend is in and I believe I’ve got what it takes to be an Sysop Administrator (or at least an option if you need one) before I go on id like to say that, even though my edit count is wayyyyy low, that is because i’m just editing my page and was doing lots of work a little while ago, and now that I got some holidays, I might be on more and be editing heaps more

Reasons -

• i’m Consistent - I come on this wiki at least 10-20 times a week, and know how to work it quite well. I help people who ask me questions, and even if they ask me 100 different things a day, I still answer them with the same respect and don’t get annoyed

• I like a laugh - I know this won’t help me get an administrationship I think it’s a great quality to have, and think that it is needed for a role when someone is just having a nice chat on this wiki.

• I enjoy helping people - I like helping people because, the more they learn, the more we learn about that person, be that they are funny, nice, ECT. and that would help the admins pick a good admin.

• I know computers - I enjoy working on computers allot. And even though i’m new to this wiki, I edit some other wikis with friends, which helps me understand how they work

• I don’t like spam, vandalism or bad language - these three things are my least favorite thing on a wiki. Vandalism doesn’t help anybody and so when I see it I normally get rid of it, even if I am not an admin.

• I don’t do spam vandalism or use bad language - I wound NEVER EVER use bad language or spamming. Also, I would never ever do vandalism because, as ive stated before, doesn't help anybody.

• I only act mean when others are mean - I would never go off at someone, and by this mean for mean thing I mean that if someone said "your and *beep*ing idiot", I would say, "please don’t say that to anyone ever again or I might have to ban you for a little while to learn your lesson". if they swore or vandalized my page again I would tell them that they will be banned once I speak with other admins (if it is really bad I would probably ban them for 24 hours so that I could catch up with the other admins to see what we should do with him/her so that they don’t affect the whole of smashwiki.

• I love the SSB series - I love SSB series as much as I love this wiki. I like playing people on the Wi-fi and am competitive as a gamer. I’m normally up for a brawl fest (like 10 different people in a day) every few months and about 10 battles a month too

• I can contribute allot more - I can contribute to most pages that have to do with finishing the game because I’ve almost done that (89% on subspace and 6 more red boxes I have to open)

• I will help on most character info - I like to know allot about my characters and so I research on them allot (EG. how much percent is needed to KO a character off a throw. Ikes down throw is about 155%)

• I can solve many problems - I like solving most problems and like to do them when i’m bored. if someone is having a fight over who is the best character I will step in after a bit of thought saying something like "I see your problem but they are both good, and for their different reasons, so you might be good as someone because there fast but the other character might be good at a different because of their strength.

So that’s why I think i'm an ideal Admin for smashwiki

Support

• Support. He is extremely skilled with wiki's he may not have much edits but he knows a hell of a lot about what he is doing. He is also an awsome brawler, he rocks at SSBB.--MysteryHeff ~ Ike Rox Sox off ^{TALK ~ CONTRIBS} 04:09, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Any examples you's like to share with us? Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 04:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

• Oppose Who are you?SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 02:37, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. I guess maybe I should wait 'til you provide some reasoning but... uh... you've got a grand total of 55 edits, 47 of which are to the user/user talk namespace. So uh... yea. In re your reasoning: be that as it may (and that's all well and good), until you demonstrate those attributes (and others, like good conflict resolution/mediation/user conflict skills, knowledge of this Wiki Culture, etc., etc.) in your actual edits I must oppose. – Defiant Elements +talk 02:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose I haven't seen ONE edit from you. Try rollback first. Masterman Happy Holidays!! 02:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Slight oppose Whoa whoa whoa, hold up, brah. You have an edit count of six. That's nothing compared to the admins here. And Masterman is right. I'll support you for rollback if you run for it. Koopa Claus ^{Happy Holidays} 03:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose You neither demonstrate nor show any reason for being considered for this position. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 03:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose Sorry dude, you gotta wait a little bit before running. Show the wiki what you can do, and then run for rollback. Just get more accustomed to how things work here. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 04:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. Who are you? JtM =^] (talk) 04:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• See above --Shadowcrest 15:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. Inexperienced; come back much later and I'd think about it, but not yet. Miles (talk) 20:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose One who's still learning the ropes of this wiki. You're very inexperienced, and should know how the flow of things go before trying for sysop again. Friedbeef1 Ho ho ho! 21:09, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Slight Oppose. And I quote BNK, "whoa whoa whoa, hold up". Dude, you're pretty new to this Wiki, and, like most of my friends in this section, you still need a lot of experience here. Try rollback first. Unlike admins, who can block users, delete pages, and revert an edit at once, you only have the latter ability, which is quicker and more efficient than checking a page's history. Try it, you can build up support from some of these users if you show some potential as a rollback'r. MarioGalaxy ^{A Galaxy begins anew...} 21:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose Work should be done before rewards, not after. Promising to do more edits does you no credit in the eyes of the bureacrats who choose admins. --Toon Ganondorf^CHAT 01:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

• Neutral: He could do a allright job but hi edits no way you need to edit more pages before you become a admin. -- Jebus4eva^TALK 03:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

My conscience will not let that comment stand unopposed. Edit count is in no way proportional to capability as an admin. --Shadowcrest 21:17, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

---