17,340
edits
Forum:Status instead of skill: Difference between revisions
m
1 revision: pages
No edit summary |
m (1 revision: pages) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:I personally don't see anything wrong with continuing to call it skill. If someone claims they're a pro, but have never been to a tournament, people can just inform them and request it be changed to Pro-Am or Semi-Pro. In truth, I don't think it's one or the other, but rather both. These denominations could both be interpreted as skill and status. - [[User:GalaxiaD|GalaxiaD]] ([[User talk:GalaxiaD|talk]]) 21:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | :I personally don't see anything wrong with continuing to call it skill. If someone claims they're a pro, but have never been to a tournament, people can just inform them and request it be changed to Pro-Am or Semi-Pro. In truth, I don't think it's one or the other, but rather both. These denominations could both be interpreted as skill and status. - [[User:GalaxiaD|GalaxiaD]] ([[User talk:GalaxiaD|talk]]) 21:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
::"Pro" is in no way an actual definition of skill. It is a definition of status. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 22:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | ::"Pro" is in no way an actual definition of skill. It is a definition of status. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 22:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
i dont know, seems kind of cocky to do something like that for some reason [[Special:Contributions/69.12.204.107|69.12.204.107]] 00:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | |||