17,340
edits
Forum:Status instead of skill: Difference between revisions
m
1 revision: pages
(New Page: {{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> OK, so I've been doing a lot of thinking about how to improv...) |
m (1 revision: pages) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It wouldn't hurt to get everyone's input on these classifications, so we can work out a legit definition for each. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 20:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | It wouldn't hurt to get everyone's input on these classifications, so we can work out a legit definition for each. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 20:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I personally don't see anything wrong with continuing to call it skill. If someone claims they're a pro, but have never been to a tournament, people can just inform them and request it be changed to Pro-Am or Semi-Pro. In truth, I don't think it's one or the other, but rather both. These denominations could both be interpreted as skill and status. - [[User:GalaxiaD|GalaxiaD]] ([[User talk:GalaxiaD|talk]]) 21:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
::"Pro" is in no way an actual definition of skill. It is a definition of status. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 22:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
i dont know, seems kind of cocky to do something like that for some reason [[Special:Contributions/69.12.204.107|69.12.204.107]] 00:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | |||