Talk:Newcomer: Difference between revisions
MHStarCraft (talk | contribs) m (→Merge) |
m (→Merge: Support) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''Merge''' Same. [[User:Dots|Dots]] [[User talk:Dots|The]] [[Special:Contributions/Dots|Thanksgiving]] [[File:NintenNESsprite.png|19px]] 18:47, 21 November 2012 (EST) | '''Merge''' Same. [[User:Dots|Dots]] [[User talk:Dots|The]] [[Special:Contributions/Dots|Thanksgiving]] [[File:NintenNESsprite.png|19px]] 18:47, 21 November 2012 (EST) | ||
'''Merge''' Yeah, read both, and it seems fine for both to be merged together. --[[User:Airconny|<font color="blue">'''Airconny'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Airconny|talk]]) 18:52, 21 November 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 18:52, November 21, 2012
Deletion
Against. As Fandango said, just because the term is self-explanatory does not make it unimportant - if that were the case, we should be deleting the character and stage articles. It's an official term used frequently to describe certain characters. User:EPX2/sig 11:12, December 8, 2007 (EST)
- I'm against it, too. Like EPX2 said, it's an offical term, used by Sakurai himself. - Brawlmatt202 16:49, December 8, 2007 (EST)
Merge
What do you people think? I'm neutral on this myself. Air Conditioner 
~~~~ 17:04, 15 October 2012 (EDT)
- Bump. Air Conditioner
~~~~ 18:06, 16 October 2012 (EDT)
- Bump again. Air Conditioner OH GOD A HURRICANE 09:13, 30 October 2012 (EDT)
- Bump again. Air Conditioner
I think the beginning information on this article and Veteran's could be assimilated with the list in their own sections, but we don't need the who's newcomer who's veteran list as we already have the table. --RoyboyX Talk 11:10, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
Merge Looking over both articles, I'd say it's okay to merge this.--Starman125 (talk) 17:52, 21 November 2012 (EST)
Merge Same. Dots The Thanksgiving 
18:47, 21 November 2012 (EST)
Merge Yeah, read both, and it seems fine for both to be merged together. --Airconny (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2012 (EST)
