SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Kperfekt: Difference between revisions

I'm Kperfekt. I usually spell check articles on here, or revert vandalism. Most of you will probably look at my edit count and be impressed until you realize the majority of those edits are to talk pages. I know I don't have the best track record, but since 2008 I've changed. I don't troll people, I don't disrespect them, and I have not stirred up trouble in a long time. I want rollback powers for two reasons. One, is obviously because I could revert vandalism or untrue but good faith edits quickly and without clogging the recent edits. But, the second reason, as non-related as it may be, is due to me feeling like I have to prove something. I don't want anyone here to think I'm the same jerk I once was. I want to show everyone that I can be trusted as an editor here, and that I can be trusted with even the slightest bit of power. I ask that I at least be given the powers to show I will not in any way, shape, or form abuse them. And I truly, truly apologize for the attitude I once had. Please, give me a second chance. At the bottom of this request I will add the other Wiki's I have started or that I administrate on, several of which are thriving. Thank you for your time.

'''[[User:Kperfekt722|<span style="color:purple;">Kperfekt</span>]]''' [[User talk:Kperfekt722|<span style="color:red;">^BURN!!!</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kperfekt722|<span style="color:yellow;">^{Revert That!}</span>]] 01:16, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

#'''Neutral, leaning slightly to support''': I hadn't noticed that you were also referred to KP317, and so missed that little detail about your 3+ chances. After reading all the chances you've had, I don't know if this time has been long enough to get away from 7+ blocks and a bunch of requests tried. I can tell that you've changed, hence leaning to support, but I'm not sure that you've given enough time to this so as to make you've trusted. '''<font face="Lucida Handwriting" style="font-size:11px;">[[User:RAN1|<font color="#9D1B1B">R</font><font color="#1D628E">A</font><font color="#467637">N</font><font color="#555">1</font>]]</font>''' <font face="Monotype Corsiva">([[User talk:RAN1|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RAN1|contributions]])</font> 02:26, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

#'''Neutral leaning towards support.'''  KP's been behaving himself here for quite a while now, and does revert some. [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 04:42, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

#You're no longer a liability but you don't really edit. I don't see a compelling reason for you to have the tools, but I don't see a compelling reason to deny them to you. As a side note, despite my noted lack of faith in people, I do believe you've changed. I haven't talked to you really since our super long irc chat, goodness like nearly a year ago, but most people do a lot of growing up at about this time in their lives, if I am correct about your age and circumstances. We had something of a very neutral understanding back then methinks, but we also can't completely ignore your history. You had a natural talent for causing shitstorms, and while I don't see any way you can cause shitstorms with rollback, I'm still somewhat wary. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 05:09, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

#:'''Addendum: Neutral leaning towards opposed, for what it's worth.''' I'm starting to remember everything a bit clearer now. I'm also starting to think that even though you haven't been a liability, you haven't been a liability ''because'' you've not edited, not you've not been a liability ''but'' you haven't edited. Your attitude throughout the comments section is one of entitlement. You're not entitled to rollback, KP, anything but. Rollback isn't run on a +/- votes system. It's run on a 'okay, someone convince the bureaus you deserve these tools.' You're at an advantage typically because you get the first say and the say everyone reads. There could be 25+ supports but if all they say is 'Woop woop I love the sombrero give this guy rollback woop woop' and 1 person, an IP even, says 'Here are the following reasons why this user should not get rollback' and provides several examples of conduct that make us not think you are fit for rollback or that you have a place on this site with any sort of power, then you don't get rollback. TL;DR version: (1) you're not entitled to rollback so don't even vaguely act like it (2) this isn't a voting sytem. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 15:34, May 4, 2010 (UTC)