SmashWiki:New Logo Proposal: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
Solar Dragon (talk | contribs) m (→Support) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
====Support==== | ====Support==== | ||
# | #'''''Support''''' - I like it. It is styles after the Wikipedia logo which, in my mind, is THE wiki logo. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian;">[[User:Solar Dragon|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="red">Solar</font> <font color="blue">Dragon</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Solar Dragon|<font color="gold">Talk</font>]])</sup></span>☆ 06:28, March 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
Revision as of 01:28, March 15, 2010
Firstly, I wasn't sure which namespace to put this in, but this seemed like the right one. Anyway...
| Current Logo | Proposed Logo |
|---|---|
 |
|
You may have already seen this on one of my subpages - I decided to make it an official proposal, so I moved it out of the user namespace.
This wiki's current logo is just over two years old, and while interesting-looking, is somewhat bland. (This may be just because we've been staring at it for two years, though.) The new logo is colourful (but not overly so), Wikipedia-styled, and fresh. So, I ask: who would like to see something with a bit more pop? Change isn't always good, but I believe in this case it is. Toomai Glittershine 
The Stats Guy 02:37, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Support
- Support - I like it. It is styles after the Wikipedia logo which, in my mind, is THE wiki logo. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 06:28, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose - While your logo is of brilliant design, the one we have now is good enough. It's the Master Hand gripping the Super Smash Bros. series emblem. The representation of that is incredible. Plus, the text on it is custom. Yours has Aharoni, a type of text I find very generic and used much too often. :$ BNK [E|T|C] 02:50, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sorry, but I don't see this as an improvement (or even a static) over the current. The current logo is unique, interesting, and not distracting to the eyes. Your proposed logo is too busy. For the logo to be in the corner of the screen the whole time someone is on this site, it shouldn't keep calling attention to itself. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 04:08, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
