Forum:Massive SmashWiki To-do List: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
**{{t|image}}
**{{t|image}}
**{{t|Infobox Enemy}}
**{{t|Infobox Enemy}}
**{{t|controller}}
*'''Mini-Projects'''<br>
*'''Mini-Projects'''<br>
Mini-projects are groups of articles that need improving but don't merit a full project themselves.
Mini-projects are groups of articles that need improving but don't merit a full project themselves.
Line 23: Line 24:
**[[List of SSBM trophies|Trophy]] [[List of SSBB trophies|lists]]
**[[List of SSBM trophies|Trophy]] [[List of SSBB trophies|lists]]
**[[User:Toomai/Moveset tables in progress|Completing this]]
**[[User:Toomai/Moveset tables in progress|Completing this]]
**Controller and button articles need major expansion


==be bold==
==be bold==

Revision as of 17:48, July 9, 2009

Forums: Index Watercooler Massive SmashWiki To-do List

I decided that theres should be a massive compiled to-do list for everything that needs doing on Smashwiki. Please cross things off (don't remove!) that have been completed, and add to this as necessary. Miles (talk) 20:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Master List

Mini-projects are groups of articles that need improving but don't merit a full project themselves.

    • Change Pros/Cons to Attributes on all character articles, including Melee and N64
    • Cleanup moveset sections
    • Change the Changes from Melee to Brawl sections from bullet from to paragraph form
    • HP for enemies
    • Trophy lists
    • Completing this
    • Controller and button articles need major expansion

be bold

Why are we encouraging people to tag things with a template rather than telling them to clean it up themselves? Shadowcrest 23:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Better the former than neither. Miles (talk) 01:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Do we really need to use a forum topic for this? You should use a project page like the Post-Merge Cleanup. - Hatake91 (talk) 12:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Forums allow for the discussion to take place right on the same page- I rather like the style, actually. Once we iron out all the disagreements and such, we can write a project page or something.
At Miles, just barely. Telling people to tag things gives them a sense that they're helping, when really they're barely doing anything. We don't have a shortage of users who are willing to tag sections for cleanup- we have a shortage of users who are willing to actually do the cleanup. Unless you are volunteering to take on this monumental task (kudos if you are- I know I'm too lazy to), I would recommend against this course of action. Shadowcrest 15:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
I try to when I can, but it's daunting. At least if they're tagging, though, they're helping out those who do have the initiative to do such overhaul edits. Miles (talk) 22:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Anyone else notice

That less than half of the Melee fighter pages have movesets listed?L33t Silvie I see wat u did thar...

Movesets = moveset tables?

You've noted both "cleanup moveset sections" and "completing [the moveset tables]". Would it be good if I put each table into the character articles once complete? Toomai Glittershine Toomai.png eXemplary Logic cntrbs 02:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)