Forum:Delete vs. Speedy Delete: Difference between revisions
(New Page: {{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I'd like to take this opportunity to remind people that the S...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | {{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I'd like to take this opportunity to remind people that the Speedy Delete template should ''only'' be used on pages where there is no conceivable way that the page could remain on the wiki. Pages that qualify for this are either pages that are markedly spam (i.e. "ASDLKASJDNNDIS") or are ''immediate'' remakes of deleted pages. Pages that should ''not'' be tagged for speedy deletion include Smasher and crew pages of little notability and techniques/glitches that may not work. The point of speedy delete is that there need be no discussion of the deletion. However, presumption goes affirmative on pages staying on the wiki, so if there is any question, use the delete template, not the speedy delete. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 20:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC) | I'd like to take this opportunity to remind people that the Speedy Delete template should ''only'' be used on pages where there is no conceivable way that the page could remain on the wiki. Pages that qualify for this are either pages that are markedly spam (i.e. "ASDLKASJDNNDIS") or are ''immediate'' remakes of deleted pages. Pages that should ''not'' be tagged for speedy deletion include Smasher and crew pages of little notability and techniques/glitches that may not work. The point of speedy delete is that there need be no discussion of the deletion. However, presumption goes affirmative on pages staying on the wiki, so if there is any question, use the delete template, not the speedy delete. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 20:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks for telling us how to do something we already knew how to do. <span style="border:2px outset #ff66ff;background-color: #66ff99;-moz-border-radius:3px">'''[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#9900ff;">Blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#9900ff">Ninjakoopa</span>]]'''</span> 21:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:38, May 7, 2009
I'd like to take this opportunity to remind people that the Speedy Delete template should only be used on pages where there is no conceivable way that the page could remain on the wiki. Pages that qualify for this are either pages that are markedly spam (i.e. "ASDLKASJDNNDIS") or are immediate remakes of deleted pages. Pages that should not be tagged for speedy deletion include Smasher and crew pages of little notability and techniques/glitches that may not work. The point of speedy delete is that there need be no discussion of the deletion. However, presumption goes affirmative on pages staying on the wiki, so if there is any question, use the delete template, not the speedy delete. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 20:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for telling us how to do something we already knew how to do. Blue Ninjakoopa 21:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
