Talk:Donkey Kong (SSBM): Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→verification) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
My guess is that there '''is'''' nothing truly required for "verification". [[User:Zixor|Zixor]] ([[User talk:Zixor|talk]]) 20:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC) | My guess is that there '''is'''' nothing truly required for "verification". [[User:Zixor|Zixor]] ([[User talk:Zixor|talk]]) 20:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Well, I guess the discovery information wasn't redundant. It appeared as such at the time. ([[User:Wolf O'Donnell|Wolf O'Donnell]] <small>([[User talk:Wolf O'Donnell|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Wolf O'Donnell|contributions]])</small> 01:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)) | |||
Revision as of 20:40, October 28, 2008
verification
How must this be (officially) verified? Zixor (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Video is the preferred method. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 00:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
-and what would one do with the video? Zixor (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Give me the link, and I will post it. (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 05:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC))
I have no such link. I am merely curious as to the method by which one would go about obtaining verification. As well, I am curious why this article, in particular, requires verification, and what would change should it be "granted". Zixor (talk) 16:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
My guess is that there is' nothing truly required for "verification". Zixor (talk) 20:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I guess the discovery information wasn't redundant. It appeared as such at the time. (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 01:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC))
