SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/The blue blur

Result: Rollback not granted. More opposes than supports. (Non-bureaucrat close.) Miles (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Supported by bureau Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

The Blue Blur

Hello. I'm The Blue Blur, also known as TBB or Blue/Blur. I'm requesting rollback because I belive I can do a good deal of vandalism reverting. I, like other users on this great wiki are always watching that "Recent changes" box and checking for vandals etc. I know some people here on Smashwiki like me, and some don't, but let's put that aside for my request. I promise I will use this feature for Vandalism reverting only, not for greed, power or any other negative aspects of this feature. Anyways, thanks for reading and voting and, let's hope it all goes well. Remember, honest votes please! Thanks, --~Teh Blue Blur~^{~You're too slow!~} 13:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Votes/Comments

• Strong support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 13:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose. You show little to no need for the tool, as you do little vandalism reverting, but rather just reverting of other user's edits because you think they're wrong. Also, you fail to follow some policies, if that matters.Smoreking^(T) _(c) 13:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose - 1)You're only running because a lot of other users have the tool, and 2) most of your "reverts" have been reverted back by other users because of your terrible grammar and ill temper (look on my talk page for the bolded text in all caps). Also, per Smoreking. Blue Ninjakoopa 15:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Support As per Pikamander. Everyone's going to say "I'm voting 'cause he's in the same crew", nut I'm not so if you hold that idea, hold it to yourself. Ike's Best Buddy/ Bird Of Prey^{Don't try me}
• Support Along with Pikaminder and IBB. Unknown the Hedgehog 16:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Neutral. Some reverts, some policy violations. They cancel each other out, leaving you with no positive or negative points about you, IMO. Miles (talk) 16:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Support- Who cares people, it's rollback --Shadowcrest 16:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, so now rollback is just given out? Come on, I stopped trolling TBB a long time ago lol Blue Ninjakoopa 16:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

• Support - Just because Blue said no and it's fun contradicting him. Also what Shadowcrest said. Shade487z 16:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Massive Oppose User only made six reverts in last 500 edits, most of them reverts on talk and user pages. It seems that the user is striving for power rather than revert vandalism. Friedbeef1Screech 18:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose Smoreking. Masterman 2009 18:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Neutral. I don't really think rollback is anything special, but the policy violations as noted above make the promotion seem questionable... Alice 18:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Support. It's rollback, what harm can he do? JtM =^] (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose. Uh... no, you don't deserve these powers. Not after the way you've been acting recently. - GalaxiaD ^Talk 19:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose Policy violations... That's what killed me too. Kperfekt ^{BURN!!! Revert That!} 19:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Neutral Combo of reverts, but also of wiki violations. ClonedPickle 20:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Opposes don't get much bigger I believe Blur is running merely because he wants some form of power. Only 2 mainspace reverts, and more than three quarters of your contributions are to user and talk pages. Plus the policy violations and baiting...Even Pikamander's reasons are not enough to get you this.Gutripper^Speak
• Comment His reverts haven't been vandalism, they've been against other users in edits wars and such.Smoreking^(T) _(c) 00:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)