[dismiss]
| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
SmashWiki talk:User concerns and complaints: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
It certainly seems like a good idea, in principle, to have a process of dealing with these issues. That being said though, I am somewhat concerned about how certain aspects of this could be applied. For example: could this, in theory, be used to police good-faith SmashWiki users off-site, such as for comments that a user may disagree with (but aren't actually cases of harassment or discrimination)? We don't want to create a situation in which users constantly feel like they're being patrolled, even when off-wiki, do we? Again, I agree with this in principle, but I think it's important that great care and discretion is taken when handling user concerns. ''[[User:Alex the weeb|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex the weeb|<span style="color: red;">'''Weeb'''</span>]]'' 13:46, March 9, 2021 (EST) | It certainly seems like a good idea, in principle, to have a process of dealing with these issues. That being said though, I am somewhat concerned about how certain aspects of this could be applied. For example: could this, in theory, be used to police good-faith SmashWiki users off-site, such as for comments that a user may disagree with (but aren't actually cases of harassment or discrimination)? We don't want to create a situation in which users constantly feel like they're being patrolled, even when off-wiki, do we? Again, I agree with this in principle, but I think it's important that great care and discretion is taken when handling user concerns. ''[[User:Alex the weeb|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex the weeb|<span style="color: red;">'''Weeb'''</span>]]'' 13:46, March 9, 2021 (EST) | ||
:That's a fair point, but I don't think anyone is going to oppose banning a person who is openly discriminatory or intends to do harm to the wiki or a user. If a user is wary of what they're posting then maybe what they're doing probably isn't a good thing. [[User:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:#850FFA; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Señor'''</span> <span style="color:#850FFA;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px green">'''Mexicano'''</span>]] ''[[User talk:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:lightpurple;text-shadow:0px 0px 2px lightgreen">(talk)</span>]]'' 13:49, March 9, 2021 (EST) | :That's a fair point, but I don't think anyone is going to oppose banning a person who is openly discriminatory or intends to do harm to the wiki or a user. If a user is wary of what they're posting then maybe what they're doing probably isn't a good thing. [[User:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:#850FFA; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Señor'''</span> <span style="color:#850FFA;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px green">'''Mexicano'''</span>]] ''[[User talk:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:lightpurple;text-shadow:0px 0px 2px lightgreen">(talk)</span>]]'' 13:49, March 9, 2021 (EST) | ||
::I agree on that. In fact I've seen multiple instances of people bragging about plans to vandalize the Wiki on Twitter, for example. Clear cut cases of harassment or intent to damage the Wiki are not what concern me. It's how this process could potentially be abused, since it deals with off-wiki activity, that concerns me. ''[[User:Alex the weeb|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex the weeb|<span style="color: red;">'''Weeb'''</span>]]'' 13:52, March 9, 2021 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 14:52, March 9, 2021
First of all the name could do with some better ideas I think it's a bit clunky.
But anyway, this was spawned by a Discord discussion where it was determined that we don't have an "inviting" way (for lack of a better word) for users with a private problem to come forth with said problem. Discuss. Toomai Glittershine 
The Yoshi 23:54, March 8, 2021 (EST)
- I really like this. A system like this would streamline the process for any person who has a concern or complaint about someone else. I have no input to give on the page itself or the title - both look fine to me. Black Vulpine of the 🦊Furry Nation🐺. Furries make the internets go! :3 03:06, March 9, 2021 (EST)
It certainly seems like a good idea, in principle, to have a process of dealing with these issues. That being said though, I am somewhat concerned about how certain aspects of this could be applied. For example: could this, in theory, be used to police good-faith SmashWiki users off-site, such as for comments that a user may disagree with (but aren't actually cases of harassment or discrimination)? We don't want to create a situation in which users constantly feel like they're being patrolled, even when off-wiki, do we? Again, I agree with this in principle, but I think it's important that great care and discretion is taken when handling user concerns. Alex the Weeb 13:46, March 9, 2021 (EST)
- That's a fair point, but I don't think anyone is going to oppose banning a person who is openly discriminatory or intends to do harm to the wiki or a user. If a user is wary of what they're posting then maybe what they're doing probably isn't a good thing. Señor Mexicano (talk) 13:49, March 9, 2021 (EST)
- I agree on that. In fact I've seen multiple instances of people bragging about plans to vandalize the Wiki on Twitter, for example. Clear cut cases of harassment or intent to damage the Wiki are not what concern me. It's how this process could potentially be abused, since it deals with off-wiki activity, that concerns me. Alex the Weeb 13:52, March 9, 2021 (EST)
