SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Kperfekt: Difference between revisions

#'''Support.''' you may be a bit of an a-hole, but you still do work on this wiki, and i can respect that. [[User:Xtrme|<span style="color:Gray">Xtrme</span>]] [[User talk:Xtrme|<span style="color:Gold">What</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Xtrme|<span style="color:Red">ever</span>]]

#'''Slight''' See PoD, and I trust KP as a user.'''[[User:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color:#5F9EA0">Smoreking</span>]]<small>^{[[User Talk:Smorekingxg456#Top|<span style="color:#00FF00">(T)</span>]]}</small><small>_{[[Special:Contributions/Smorekingxg456|(c)]]}</small>''' 02:46, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

#'''Minor Support''': Meh, seeing how rollbackers in the past, regardless of their history on this wiki, good or bad, have done a relatively good job (although there were some who abused the ability on a few occasions, not naming anyone in particular), I don't see why not. '''[[User:MarioGalaxy|<span style="color:darkslateblue">Mario</span><span style="color:#000033">Galaxy</span>]]'''^{<small>'''[[User talk:MarioGalaxy|<span style="color:lightslategray">May Guthix be with you...</span>]]'''</small>} 23:13, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

:#Edit C-Hawk linked below.

:[[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 02:29, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

====Neutral====

#:'''Addendum: Neutral leaning towards opposed, for what it's worth.''' I'm starting to remember everything a bit clearer now. I'm also starting to think that even though you haven't been a liability, you haven't been a liability ''because'' you've not edited, not you've not been a liability ''but'' you haven't edited. Your attitude throughout the comments section is one of entitlement. You're not entitled to rollback, KP, anything but. Rollback isn't run on a +/- votes system. It's run on a 'okay, someone convince the bureaus you deserve these tools.' You're at an advantage typically because you get the first say and the say everyone reads. There could be 25+ supports but if all they say is 'Woop woop I love the sombrero give this guy rollback woop woop' and 1 person, an IP even, says 'Here are the following reasons why this user should not get rollback' and provides several examples of conduct that make us not think you are fit for rollback or that you have a place on this site with any sort of power, then you don't get rollback. TL;DR version: (1) you're not entitled to rollback so don't even vaguely act like it (2) this isn't a voting sytem. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 15:34, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

#+1 to everything semi has said.  Also, I will add two things.  First, Rollback should be something you get after you've proved that you are a better contributor, not something you should need to be a good contributor.  I don't think that's how you meant it, so I don't hold it against you.  Second, I want to call atention to something you said in (one of) you last requests:  "I'm requesting rollback rights...because its [sic] the first step toward being on the top of this Wiki."  I ''sincerely'' hope this is not why you are requesting rollback this time...  Basically, my stance is this:  I am not going to support your bid for rollback for the stated reasons and other history, but I will not stand in the way of a community decision to give you rollback.  [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 17:09, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

#Neutral learning barely towards oppose, for reading all of the reasons given. --[[User:KoRoBeNiKi|KoRoBeNiKi]] ([[User talk:KoRoBeNiKi|talk]]) 19:07, May 4, 2010 (UTC)