User talk:Nergal06: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New Page: ==2nd time== This is the second time you have unjustifiably removed information added by user RatedMforMario. Last time you did it I explained to you why some of his edits were removed...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is the second time you have unjustifiably removed information added by user RatedMforMario. Last time you did it I explained to you why some of his edits were removed, and why it was not applicable in this case, but you appear to have not listened, so I'm warning you here on your talk page. Make sure you understand the situation before attempting to get involved in or escalate it. ''[[User:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex Parpotta'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: red;">'''flying lobster!'''</span>]]'' 11:22, 6 February 2018 (EST) | This is the second time you have unjustifiably removed information added by user RatedMforMario. Last time you did it I explained to you why some of his edits were removed, and why it was not applicable in this case, but you appear to have not listened, so I'm warning you here on your talk page. Make sure you understand the situation before attempting to get involved in or escalate it. ''[[User:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex Parpotta'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: red;">'''flying lobster!'''</span>]]'' 11:22, 6 February 2018 (EST) | ||
*Forgive me but I found that what RatedMforMario added to Marth's page was unnecessary, a waste of space and misleading to our audiences. To say that Marth's tier placement in Smash 4 is his worst in the series is a poor, low quality edit and a complete slap in the face to competitive play due to the constantly changing meta game as well as Marth's widely-discussed current tier placement. Marth has always been a good character and has strong results across all three titles, and the introduction of "(Smash 4) is his worst placement to date" is not fitting and nothing more than a busy-edit/bored by this user. Had he made statement similar to this in regards to Sheik's noticeably lower tier placement in Brawl, then that would be understandable and worthwhile to include. But I respect our readers too much to allow these kinds of edits that simply regurgitate irrelevant facts and I will correct pages that I believe lower the quality of our wiki. [[User:Nergal06|Nergal06]] ([[User talk:Nergal06#top|talk]]) 13:40, 6 February 2018 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 13:40, February 6, 2018
2nd time
This is the second time you have unjustifiably removed information added by user RatedMforMario. Last time you did it I explained to you why some of his edits were removed, and why it was not applicable in this case, but you appear to have not listened, so I'm warning you here on your talk page. Make sure you understand the situation before attempting to get involved in or escalate it. Alex Parpotta the flying lobster! 11:22, 6 February 2018 (EST)
- Forgive me but I found that what RatedMforMario added to Marth's page was unnecessary, a waste of space and misleading to our audiences. To say that Marth's tier placement in Smash 4 is his worst in the series is a poor, low quality edit and a complete slap in the face to competitive play due to the constantly changing meta game as well as Marth's widely-discussed current tier placement. Marth has always been a good character and has strong results across all three titles, and the introduction of "(Smash 4) is his worst placement to date" is not fitting and nothing more than a busy-edit/bored by this user. Had he made statement similar to this in regards to Sheik's noticeably lower tier placement in Brawl, then that would be understandable and worthwhile to include. But I respect our readers too much to allow these kinds of edits that simply regurgitate irrelevant facts and I will correct pages that I believe lower the quality of our wiki. Nergal06 (talk) 13:40, 6 February 2018 (EST)
