[dismiss]
| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Template talk:See
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
...is this template really needed? Miles (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
- It will probably be pretty niche, but I can see a use for it in pages linking to more detailed info. Nyargleblargle (Talk) 15:09, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
- I guess I'm not seeing the value of it in terms of code reduction, especially given that the "(see here)" setup isn't really very widely-used. Miles (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
- I made it because I am finding myself using that setup a lot in the Melee debug articles. It's fine if this is not wanted. I've only used it 3 times (and all in the same article). Serpent King (talk) 18:19, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
- Doesn't the main article template already accomplish the goal you're trying to achieve with this one?
Aidan, Master of Speed and Aura
18:32, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
- Kind of, but with that, you are confined to linking only to articles, not sections, and especially not sections within the article the template is used for. You can link to those things, sure, but it would make no sense. Serpent King (talk) 18:41, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
- Doesn't the main article template already accomplish the goal you're trying to achieve with this one?
- I made it because I am finding myself using that setup a lot in the Melee debug articles. It's fine if this is not wanted. I've only used it 3 times (and all in the same article). Serpent King (talk) 18:19, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
- I guess I'm not seeing the value of it in terms of code reduction, especially given that the "(see here)" setup isn't really very widely-used. Miles (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
(Reset indent) That's what a # is for. Like, as opposed to putting just Sonic, you would put Sonic#Trivia. 
Aidan, Master of Speed and Aura
18:46, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
- Right, I got that, but as the template says "Main Article" it doesn't really make sense to link to a section. Serpent King (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
