Template talk:PGR
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deletion[edit]
Oppose. This template specifically focuses on PGR, which is by far the largest and most important ranking system today. Not only that, but the Global PR is mixed with unofficial PRs and other past rankings, which makes it harder for it to stand out. I suggest keeping it for integrity's sake. Cookies
Creme 20:45, January 6, 2020 (EST)
- While I do agree that the PGR is the largest ranking system today, it still doesn't change the fact that this template is redundant. The GlobalPR template already lists everything this template does and more. And due to it not being PGR before, this template also shows an incomplete list of the Melee rankings. The unofficial PR issue and moving them onto a separate template is still up for debate on it's talk page. I Support deleting this template. Pokebub (talk) 21:42, January 6, 2020 (EST)
- I was also going to bring up the fact that there are pages on the wiki with redundant templates, but I guess I had a memory lapse since I can't find it. If that's the case then I guess I'm more neutral, but I still strongly believe this should stay, especially since, in the future, there are just going to be more PRs for both PGR and other games, and if the split proposal doesn't pass then it's going to make said template extremely crowded, which isn't always that pleasant to see. I'd say first wait for that proposal to reach a consensus before considering deletion. Cookies
Creme 21:58, January 6, 2020 (EST)
- Personally I agree with you cookies on this deletion because it could still be going on with future ranking systems.S3AHAWK
(Talk) 21:46, April 25, 2020 (EDT)
- I support deleting this template because all Panda Global Rankings are contained within the Global PR. I agree that the PGRs are the largest and most important contemporary ranking systems, as previously stated by Cookies and Creme, but a possible solution here would be to edit the template so it groups together the Panda Global Rankings per game. Even then, this template has become redundant, and I believe it should be deleted. Acgamer28
00:28, June 19, 2020 (EDT)
- I support deleting this template because all Panda Global Rankings are contained within the Global PR. I agree that the PGRs are the largest and most important contemporary ranking systems, as previously stated by Cookies and Creme, but a possible solution here would be to edit the template so it groups together the Panda Global Rankings per game. Even then, this template has become redundant, and I believe it should be deleted. Acgamer28
- Personally I agree with you cookies on this deletion because it could still be going on with future ranking systems.S3AHAWK
- I was also going to bring up the fact that there are pages on the wiki with redundant templates, but I guess I had a memory lapse since I can't find it. If that's the case then I guess I'm more neutral, but I still strongly believe this should stay, especially since, in the future, there are just going to be more PRs for both PGR and other games, and if the split proposal doesn't pass then it's going to make said template extremely crowded, which isn't always that pleasant to see. I'd say first wait for that proposal to reach a consensus before considering deletion. Cookies
Bumping, don't exactly think we have a consensus here yet. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Gamer (talk) 10:50, May 3, 2020 (EDT)
- Support, all that I can say is that this template is redundant, not much else to say really.
NPM🐷 Morr!? 
01:32, June 19, 2020 (EDT)
6 months later, and quite frankly I'm more neutral leaning support, especially with the GlobalPR and the Unofficial Global PR being split. CookiesCreme 13:27, June 30, 2020 (EDT)
