[dismiss]
| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Template talk:MSP
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Creation
So the idea is that this thing gets put on every moveset subpage. I have some things I want discussed first though.
- What kind of wording should we use? We want to avoid scaring off editors from improving the text, but dissuade them from editing the numbers.
- Should it be placed at the top or bottom of pages? For example, Wikipedia and Bulbapedia put this kind of thing at the bottom, which avoids top-page clutter and such, but it seems like the "please don't touch the numbers" text will never get read if it's down there.
- Should a different image/colour be used so it doesn't look like the "needs data" tag?
Toomai Glittershine 
The Sharp 23:42, 27 July 2014 (EDT)
Sorry for necro, but damn I did not know this existed. Anyway, given SmashWiki:Ownership already says that anyone is free to edit technical data provided they know what they're doing, I don't see that much of a point to this, although the extra clarity is nice. Any bad actors inserting false data would likely just be subject to standard Wiki procedure: people can check and disprove it, especially now with all the resources we have to verify it. - EndGenuity (talk) 17:29, April 26, 2021 (EDT)
