[dismiss]
Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
Notices |
---|
The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Team talk:Team Liquid
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Revised article to make sure that Smash led, but I wanted to include mentions of the Liquid DotA 2 and StarCraft II squads because not talking about them is to ignore big parts of what makes Team Liquid and a chance to explain just why it was important that they entered the Smash arena. SantosPhillipCarlo (talk) 21:17, 2 June 2014 (EDT)
- Mentioning how important Liquid is is nice. However, a line needs to be drawn for how much info we're going to cover. We really don't have to cover stuff like sponsors, while the famous players list, owner, and manager tables are also pretty unnecessary. The page formatting's also a problem, but the table content is more important right now. MegaTron1XD
21:33, 2 June 2014 (EDT)
Shouldn't Captain Crunch be put as a smasher member? He's a smasher and a member of team liquid. He plays the game at a high level and coaches Hbox and was one of the reasons he won EVO 2016. He's signed as a coach for smash, so I don't see why he shouldn't be put as a smasher member. User:NessMaster69 (talk) 13:28, 31 July 2016 (EST)