Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
Notices |
---|
The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Talk:Sweet spot (disambiguation)
Should we split the article for "sweet spot" into two articles describing each definition? That would seem most logical to me, especially considering each use of the term "sweet spot" is equally important. --MaskedMarth 17:12, October 26, 2006 (GMT)
also, we cant say the sweetspot is the strongest part AND the best comboing part because those can be two different parts of the same move...--Simna ibn Sind 23:28, October 26, 2006 (GMT)
- most useful part of the move, perhaps? or is it only the most powerful part? --MaskedMarth 04:24, October 27, 2006 (GMT)
We should definately split the two articles. One about the sweet spot for attacks and another for sweet spotting the edge.--SpeedYoshi 23:03, October 27, 2006 (EST)
i think sweetspot for attacks should be the part with the best knockback...otherwise the attack is sour spotted.--Simna ibn Sind 05:34, October 27, 2006 (GMT)
i take this to be a general concensus on splitting the article, so i'll create two articles sweet spot (hitbox) and sweet spot (ledge), and turn sweet spot into a disambig page. feel free to discuss the names in their respective talk pages. --MaskedMarth 13:57, October 27, 2006 (GMT)