Talk:Gale Boomerang

Merge

I disagree; the two should stay separated as they have different games of origin. Miles (talk - contribs) 23:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

They are essentially the same move with a different side effect, can easily be covered on one page. Games of origin doesn't mean much :/ --Shadowcrest 23:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

I think they should stay seperate because they are different moves. And the 3 reflectors arent merged so why should these. Im Alex25, King of Randomness! Say Hi to me! Random stuff! 23:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Suggested reading. --Shadowcrest 23:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Also, the Reflectors all work much differently from one another, and they also belong to different characters. Boomerang and Gale Boomerang only have one difference from each other, and they belong to the same character. - GalaxiaD ^Talk 23:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh... Well they're still different moves, each doing different damage and knockback as well as the gales ability. Im Alex25, King of Randomness! Say Hi to me! Random stuff! 23:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Reflector (Fox) still exists, and that's how every special move article should look. Strategies, pictures, etc. However, I generally think that each special move should have its own page. Miles (talk - contribs) 23:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't have much of an opinion on this, but one must realize that the two moves in question (boomerang and gale boomerang) have different names, while the 3 reflectors are all just "reflector." Cheezperson {talk}stuff 23:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah, but Bow and Hero's Bow are also different in name. However, they have no differences at all. - GalaxiaD ^Talk 23:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

AHH! NO MORE CREDIT, BYE BYE! Im Alex25, King of Randomness! Say Hi to me! Random stuff! 23:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)