Talk:Frozen Pac-Man glitch

````The Frozen Pac Man glitch will have a link in the article Pac Man.

How to preform?

I am looking at preforming this glitch. I can then upload a video if I find a way to do it. I don't think this needs to be part of Pac-Man's page. Pika66 (talk) 10:39, 2 November 2014 (EST)

Yeah, it actually does need to be put on Pac-Man's page. If a glitch is specific to a single character/stage, then it goes on that character/stage's page. This page is one such page, and is not notable enough for its own page. Rtzxy Reflect!!! 11:07, 2 November 2014 (EST)

Uhhh, I think this is out-of-date, but if it isn't, put it on the Pac's page. Pika, Wild Turkey appeared! Talkz 10:49, 4 November 2015 (EST)

Hey Rtzxy, I made some improvements on this page if you guys will stop deleting the edits, plus I support Pika66 about not being part of Pac-Man's page. Answer this, what's the point on merging this article on Pac-Man's page? It's not neccesary in need for a merge. Just like other glitches, they have their own page. (Smashworker101 (talk) 21:59, 12 November 2014 (EST))

Here's what Toomai put on your talk page:

"Stop making pages about glitches if they're simple enough to be put on a relevant character or stage page instead. And don't forget to provide proof of whatever glitches you claim to find, preferably as a video."

The glitch pages you've been making aren't notable enough for their own pages, and thus fall under the first sentence. Not all glitch pages get their own articles, you know. You also aren't following the second sentence, so there's that. Rtzxy Reflect! 22:09, 12 November 2014 (EST)

Then EXPLAIN THIS, how come the Electric Ness glitch has it's own page? This it's the simplist & easiest glitch that I ever performed in my life. That glitch is the easiest to perform and it has it own page. What kind of move is that? (Smashworker101 (talk) 19:10, 13 November 2014 (EST))

…I'm actually not so sure about that one. Community consensus maybe? Rtzxy Reflect! 19:21, 13 November 2014 (EST)

Well I guess I've prove my point here. Guess I won this debate. That settles it :b . (Smashworker101 (talk) 19:36, 13 November 2014 (EST))

That really doesn't settle it, to be honest. Whether Electric Ness should be deleted or not can become a debatable topic, and more community thoughts should be heard before deletion. Rtzxy Reflect! 19:39, 13 November 2014 (EST)

Electric Ness probably exists because it was made when SmashWiki's notability policies were different or something of the sort. PikaSamus (talk) 19:42, 13 November 2014 (EST)

Even thought we are changing the topic here, to be honest I didn't know there was a debate going on with the Electric Ness being a candidate for deletion....... and I can't believe it's still going on in 2014 -__- . (Smashworker101 (talk) 19:48, 13 November 2014 (EST))

There was never a debate for Electric Ness' deletion as no one brought it up until today. PikaSamus (talk) 19:50, 13 November 2014 (EST)

Was that bad to bring it up? (Smashworker101 (talk) 19:54, 13 November 2014 (EST))

No, it's a good point of discussion. Refer to here if you want to continue debating about it. Rtzxy Reflect! 19:56, 13 November 2014 (EST)

I really have to open my big mouth. (Smashworker101 (talk) 22:27, 14 November 2014 (EST))

If you think that suggesting we merge pages is a bad thing, it's not; it's actually a good thing, if you think about it. Debate is good; debate can cause positive things to happen, and that's a good thing. Rtzxy Reflect! 22:29, 14 November 2014 (EST)

Merge

First off:

How do we even know this glitch is exclusive to Pac-Man? If a glitch happens with one character, and it doesn't appear to be caused by a certain aspect of the first character tested, the natural thing to do is test it with others; can someone test this?

Anyways, support. This is a simple, one-step, one-requirement glitch, and currently, we barely have any information on it. Qwerty (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2014 (EST)

I support. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe Nutta. 10:24, 8 November 2014 (EST)

Eww, Frozen. Overrated as heck. I support for the reasons above. Dots (talk) The Doomguy 22:24, 12 November 2014 (EST)

Neutral There seems to be enough on the page to allow it to stand on its own. However, if it's decided to be merged, I won't object. Berrenta (talk) 12:08, 14 December 2014 (EST)

Neutral I think it should be put on Pac-Man's page if it is still available, but it may be out-of-date. And I'd prefer not to take sides on something I've never tried before. Pika, Wild Turkey appeared! Talkz 10:48, 4 November 2015 (EST)

Bump, support for three reasons:

(1) We don't need an article for EVERY glitch we see

(2) This has most likely already been patched, since it's been a year now

(3) Freeze glitches typically aren't noteworthy enough to warrant their own page.

I'd be okay with either A: Merging it with Pac-Man's article, or B: Deleting the page entirely and leaving it at that, mainly because a most likely patched freeze glitch isn't entirely the most important thing to add to a character's article in my opinion. Disaster Flare (talk) 20:22, 30 November 2015 (EST)

I'd say a fairly non-notable patched-out glitch from a year ago deserves a mention as a trivia point that links to a Youtube video demonstration, but that's about it. John PK SMAAAASH!! 21:23, 30 November 2015 (EST)

Agreed. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 11:34, 5 December 2015 (EST)

What's left

What section does it need cleanup? And Dots, we are not talking about Frozen the movie. Anyway, where does it need cleanup or is that it? (Smashworker101 (talk) 20:31, 31 December 2014 (EST))