Talk:Bomb (Samus)

Is it really necessary to have her last name here? Samus is samus. You don't see an article for "Fox McCloud's Blaster"...-Gargomon251 (talk) 06:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

The problem was that it was often being moved back and forth from "Samus' Bomb" to "Samus's Bomb". Rather than argue over which was correct, I took out that problem and simply added her last name. FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 20:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Why don't we get rid of the ridiculous name and move it to "Morph Ball Bomb"? It doesn't match the naming of, say, Link's Bomb, but it's at least an official name.–Entrea Sumatae 03:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Is it just me, or should the article's be "Bomb (Samus)", "Bomb (Link)", etc.? This fits the pattern established in relationship to Blaster with Fox/Falco/Wolf... 5280s (talk · contributions) 21:43, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Where did it ever call it "Morph Ball Bomb"??? It's ridiculous. I may just move it myself... - Gargomon251 (talk) 00:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

In response to Miles, Link and Samus have very different Bomb moves. In fact the only similarity is the fact that they both explode. It is different with Fox, Falco and Wolf, they have very slight variations on the same move. --Toon Ganondorf^CHAT 09:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I know how different all the moves are. Rather, I was trying to say that since the current article layout for the space animals was such things as Reflector (Fox), Reflector (Falco), etc., that we should be doing Bomb (Samus) and Bomb (Link) to make for clearer reading. Thoughts? {My name is Miles, and I approve this message.} 20:40, 25 October 2008 (UTC)