2,149
edits
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 15:56, October 9, 2008
, 16 years ago→I GOT IT!!!
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) m (→I GOT IT!!!) |
|||
| Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
::read the rules. [[User:Kperfekt722|KP317]] ([[User talk:Kperfekt722|talk]]) 17:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | ::read the rules. [[User:Kperfekt722|KP317]] ([[User talk:Kperfekt722|talk]]) 17:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Thanks for reading my idea and posting it as your own. Anyway, I do support this measure (as it initially was my idea). And under the current policy, KP is right that only sysops can request bureaucrat. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 17:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | Thanks for reading my idea and posting it as your own. Anyway, I do support this measure (as it initially was my idea). And under the current policy, KP is right that only sysops can request bureaucrat. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 17:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Well, I think making sysop a prerequisite for bureaucrat is stupid and should be changed, but today I have too much to do to formulate gigantic walls of text to argue my point, so perhaps another day. Clarinet Hawk (and anyone else who shares C.Hawk's point of view), please see [[SmashWiki talk:Requests for rollback]] and respond to my criticisms there. --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest</font>]] 19:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | |||