| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Forum:Question about the new changelist style seen on SSB4 pages?
I like the new way that changes are displayed in the SSB4 character articles, with categories such as "Attributes", "Ground Attacks", "Aerial Attacks", and so forth, and with the changes to the moves that fall under each category underneath. In my opinion, this makes the whole article a lot less intimidating, easier to read, and more easily accessible. My question is this: Can I start applying this new style to the Project M character pages? With so many changes to so many of the characters, this seems to be a good idea to me. The only drawback I can think of is the fact that all PM character articles will need some changes so that they are not redundant. John (talk) 18:13, 18 March 2015 (EDT)
- Personally, I think the split format would be nice for all games' "changes from previous games" sections, not just SSB4's. If you want to take the plunge and work on doing it for PM, go ahead. Toomai Glittershine
The Irrepressible 18:15, 18 March 2015 (EDT)
Yeah, the different sections make it much easier to skim through...I also think that PM should have its tier list (the final CT one) uploaded to the wiki, and maybe each character's attributes should be more fleshed outKid A (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2015 (EDT)
