Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first!
Notices
The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters.
When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted.
Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with.

Forum:"The most efficient Sticker Factory"?

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Forums: Index Watercooler "The most efficient Sticker Factory"?

The wiki page for CD Factory gives a suggestion for a high efficiency factory. It's the typical set-up where all Sandbags are led to a single point with conveyor belts. The step-by-step creation guide says you need to chose the large stage template, to increase the available surface area for item spawning.

What I don't get is: why does that matter? Spawn rate doesn't change with stage size, and if a CD/sticker spawns far away from you, it might disappear before it reaches you with the conveyor belts. So it seems to me that a small stage would be better.

Could anyone explain to me what actual benefits a large stage gives?

Only so many items can appear at a certain rate on smaller stages. Me? I just used time and patience to collect stickers. Cafinator (talk) 05:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Containers give some good assistance. But they explode, oh well, if they help they help. Learner4 (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

That one guy (he didn't sign his name) makes a good point. A smaller stage would seem more efficient than a large one. - GalaxiaD (talk) 20:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)