User talk:Serpent King/Archive 4
Wanna try out my CSS?
Just copy all of the code in User:INoMed/common.css, paste it into User:Serpent King/common.css, and save. (It is glitchy in monobook though, so use vector) INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 05:22, 10 November 2015 (EST)
- Eh, no thanks. I am fine with the default. Thanks though! Serpent King 05:23, 10 November 2015 (EST)
- What if I told you that my CSS has icons next to users on the RC (Both skins), widened search bar (Vector), and a fixed sidebar (Vector)? INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 05:27, 10 November 2015 (EST)
- What do you mean by "icons next to users on the RC"? What Icons? Serpent King 05:30, 10 November 2015 (EST)
- What if I told you that my CSS has icons next to users on the RC (Both skins), widened search bar (Vector), and a fixed sidebar (Vector)? INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 05:27, 10 November 2015 (EST)
Code hidden to prevent clutter. |
---|
a.whorb { background: url(/images/thumb/0/0b/Rollback.png/14px-Rollback.png) left no-repeat; padding:0 0 0 15px; } a.whobot { background: url(/images/thumb/1/17/Bot.png/14px-Bot.png) left no-repeat; padding:0 0 0 15px; } a.whoadmin { background: url(/images/thumb/4/46/Administrator.png/14px-Administrator.png) left no-repeat; padding:0 0 0 15px; } a.whocrat { background: url(/images/thumb/5/5c/Bureaucrat.png/14px-Bureaucrat.png) left no-repeat; padding:0 0 0 15px; } a.whodev { background: url(/images/thumb/3/32/Developer.png/14px-Developer.png) left no-repeat; padding:0 0 0 15px; } |
INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 05:36, 10 November 2015 (EST)
(Reset INoMed) Your opinion on the pseudo-gadget? INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 05:58, 10 November 2015 (EST)
Hi
Since it's long been swallowed in the recent changes, I figure I directly notify that I responded to your RfA, a punctual response if you have one would be appreciated. Omega Tyrant 18:59, 14 November 2015 (EST)
Cloud's Final Smash
If the consensus is that Cloud's FS article should not exist, then it should be removed from the template. Magiciandude (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- ...Yes. Serpent King 22:53, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- Clearly it's in favor of keeping it. Are you contradicting yourself or are you wanting to wait for more consensus? Aardvarkian (Talk • Contributions) 22:55, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- It is not in favor of keeping, actually. It's split down the middle, which is why the edit should not have been made. Serpent King 22:56, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- For some reason I interpreted your input on the page as wanting to keep it. Wow Aardvarkian (Talk • Contributions) 22:59, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- But the article still exists at the moment, which is why I added it. If the majority says to redirect, then yes it should be removed Magiciandude (talk) 22:57, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- I am saying that because the decision, either to keep or remove the page, was not yet reached, and therefore, the template should not have been added to. Serpent King 22:59, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- Once again: as long as no one has a major hang up with it, I am going to remove it from the template. Serpent King 23:03, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- It's not exactly split down the middle, unless you're counting Nyargle as for removal (which I wouldn't, since he didn't say it shouldn't exist, rather just let the discussion end). Since it's a trivial matter anyway I don't see why we can't go ahead and have it ready and then if for whatever reason thirty people show up and say delete, we remove it from those places. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 23:10, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- Consider this: We are getting news in December, which more than likely will contain details about Cloud. Those details may include the official name for his final smash, in which case we can make the article and be on our way. I really do not see the harm in waiting a few weeks on this. Serpent King 23:14, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- It also doesn't really help at all, considering we will need to change the template again at such a time anyway. Serpent King 23:15, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- At this point, this is all just really stupid and ridiculously fussy. I see no problem with going ahead with acknowledging this Final Smash in the ways we have tried. Eventually, the things you deleted will get re-added anyways, and maybe changed in the unlikely circumstance that it's wrong. I see no harm in getting this all done now. I guess it's a matter of, are we really going to care about having or not having this enough to keep going? Oh, the funnies Aardvarkian (Talk • Contributions) 23:17, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- I just want to clarify, my changes are not in the interest of having my own way, but in the interest of upholding our tradition of having a consensus vote on deletion/keeping things. Serpent King 23:20, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- Then say that instead of what you said before Aardvarkian (Talk • Contributions) 23:22, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- What are you refering to? Serpent King 23:24, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- Instead of "I don't see the harm..." it would have been better had you said "in the interest of upholding..." No matter now, it's just good to state your best reasons first you know? Aardvarkian (Talk • Contributions) 23:28, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- It's not exactly split down the middle, unless you're counting Nyargle as for removal (which I wouldn't, since he didn't say it shouldn't exist, rather just let the discussion end). Since it's a trivial matter anyway I don't see why we can't go ahead and have it ready and then if for whatever reason thirty people show up and say delete, we remove it from those places. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 23:10, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- Once again: as long as no one has a major hang up with it, I am going to remove it from the template. Serpent King 23:03, 14 November 2015 (EST)
- I am saying that because the decision, either to keep or remove the page, was not yet reached, and therefore, the template should not have been added to. Serpent King 22:59, 14 November 2015 (EST)
Just in case you'd like to read it too...
Here you go. Disaster Flare (talk) 16:03, 16 November 2015 (EST)