SmashWiki:Requests for rollback
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
This page is for requesting that one is granted rollback powers on SmashWiki.
Rules
- Only self-nominations are allowed.
- All new nominees should copy and paste the following block of text onto the end of this page:
===YourUsername=== *[link1 #1] *[link2 #2] *[link3 #3] ([[Special:Contributions/YourUsername|contributions]]) ~~~~
- Then, edit the template as follows:
- Replace "YourUsername" with your username.
- Replace "link1", "link2", and "link3" with links to three of your edits that you believe could have been uses of rollback. Avoid using multiple edits that are related, for example three reverts of a single vandal within an hour. If you do not know how to link your edits here, see the below section.
- Applications which do not follow this format may be cancelled by an admin or bureaucrat. The user in question may immediately apply again. A third incorrect application will result in you not being allowed to apply for a month.
- A bureaucrat will determine whether the edits you provided show understanding of the usage of rollback.
- If all three examples would be correct uses of rollback, then the RfR will pass (barring some extenuating circumstance).
- If all three examples would be bad/incorrect uses of rollback, the RfR will fail. The bureaucrat may then explain why the edits were not proper uses of rollback, though this is not required.
- Otherwise, the bureaucrat may open minor discussion; maybe one example is unclear as to whether rollback is appropriate, and the user would be able to argue his/her case. Other users are allowed to voice their opinion. Discussion is to be kept to a minumum. This step is not required; a bureaucrat may pass or fail an RfR without needing discussion of incorrect rollback uses.
- No other users may comment unless the RfR has been opened for discussion.
- If your RfR fails, you may not make another one for a month (i.e. if it fails on the 15th, you must wait until the 15th of the next month to try again).
- If your rollback privileges are revoked for whatever reason, barring some extenuating circumstance (e.g. discussion elsewhere that results in consensus that said revoking was unnecessary), you must also wait a month before you may re-apply.
- You may not use the same example edit in two different (uncancelled) RfRs.
Linking to edits
There are two ways to link to an edit:
- Go to your contributions (there is a link in the userbar at the top of the page, or go here). For the edit you want to link to, click on the "diff" link. Then copy what's in the address bar.
- Go to a page's history. For the edit you want to link to, click on the "prev" link. Then copy what's in the address bar.
- If you want to "select" multiple edits at once, you can use the options buttons to pick the range and then click the "Compare selected revisions" button.
Archives
- For archives from the previous RfR format, see this page.
Current requests
Nutta Butta
(contributions) ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 12:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- I'd like for you to explain why #3 should be a rollback and not an undo-with-useful-summary. Toomai Glittershine The Yellow 18:12, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- My two cents (even though I'm not Nutta), the user put the information on Pichu for no reason whatsoever, and personally, I'd rollback that one too. Aidan, Master of Speed and Aura 19:49, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- It felt to me like clearly some form of vandalism, since there has never been any evidence that Pichu was going to be in brawl. I may be wrong though, and looking at Chippy's edits now he/she generally makes good faith edits. That probably is not the best example. Should I look for a replacement example? ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 13:06, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
- Okay yes give a replacement example. Toomai Glittershine The Incomprehensible 11:44, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- I'll just link it here so that the conversation isn't confusing if I replace it. This was the second or third time someone had to add the notability tag back within only a few minutes. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 12:50, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- ...so... ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 11:55, 7 November 2015 (EST)
- I'll just link it here so that the conversation isn't confusing if I replace it. This was the second or third time someone had to add the notability tag back within only a few minutes. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 12:50, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- Okay yes give a replacement example. Toomai Glittershine The Incomprehensible 11:44, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- It felt to me like clearly some form of vandalism, since there has never been any evidence that Pichu was going to be in brawl. I may be wrong though, and looking at Chippy's edits now he/she generally makes good faith edits. That probably is not the best example. Should I look for a replacement example? ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 13:06, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
- My two cents (even though I'm not Nutta), the user put the information on Pichu for no reason whatsoever, and personally, I'd rollback that one too. Aidan, Master of Speed and Aura 19:49, 25 October 2015 (EDT)