Category talk:Active RfAs

One page included

The maintenance page says there is one page in the category, but the category page says there is none. Is it because of the page itself? Awesome Cardinal 2000 18:09, 23 September 2014 (EDT)

It's probably just a bit slow to update. It's gone on my end. Toomai Glittershine The Incomperable 18:10, 23 September 2014 (EDT)

Never seen this

What is this category? (Smashworker101 (talk) 18:30, 20 November 2014 (EST))

It's a page that lists all the active requests for adminship. Rtzxy Reflect! 18:41, 20 November 2014 (EST)

Move to Requests For Rights

Support

1. Support The main issue is if anyone is running for bureaucratship (i.e. Miles), nobody would see it, as RfBs do not have an icon on the things to do bar. Either A: This move has to happen to fix that, or B: RfBs will have to get their own icon, otherwise more low profile applications could end up going unnoticed, and nobody wants that. Disaster Flare (talk) 15:36, 6 November 2015 (EST)
2. Very strong support. Everything Disaster Flare said, honestly. Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 15:53, 6 November 2015 (EST)
3. Support This makes sense. RfBs and RfAs are pretty much in the same category. Aidan, the Wandering Space Warrior 21:26, 6 November 2015 (EST)
4. Weak Support: what we have here is a move that changes the category's scope to be more correct. Ordinarily, I would fully support this, but I feel like it's not worth the effort, as RfBs are far and few between. Serpent King 21:41, 6 November 2015 (EST)

   By the way, I fully Oppose RfBs getting their own maintenance icon. Serpent King 21:43, 6 November 2015 (EST)

5. Yep, it does seem kinda odd alright. Even if it's a rare circumstance, it's one we should be ready for. ScoreCounter 03:58, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Oppose

1. ...

Neutral

1. Neutral, leaning towards support I don't see why we can't just add a box. We did it for the prerelease images. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 16:08, 6 November 2015 (EST)
2. Neutral, leaning towards support. I'm not sure what to do, but I think we should move it. Pika, Wild Turkey appeared! Talk 16:09, 6 November 2015 (EST)

Comments

Wait a second. By this name, it sounds like RfR's also would appear here, which really confuses me. DekZek 22:07, 6 November 2015 (EST)

Uh... Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 22:13, 6 November 2015 (EST)

No...we would not put RfRs here. Serpent King 23:18, 6 November 2015 (EST)

I think the reason why that active RfRs are not included is because Rollbacker status is sadly not as important compared to admin and bureaucrat status. Dots (talk) The Bold 00:14, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Well...RfRs also do not have their own page...so... Serpent King 01:45, 7 November 2015 (EST)

RFR's are a quantitative process, and therefore don't need the attention of the wiki. They would be included in a group change like this under the old system, but the new system only needs the attention of a B'crat. ScoreCounter 03:58, 7 November 2015 (EST)