[dismiss]
| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Miles.oppenheimer
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
So...
When's this gonna be closed? Cheezperson {talk}stuff 03:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- When a bureaucrat finds it. I've tried contacting C-Hawk, but he hasn't commented on the RfA, much less closed it. It'll happen when it happens; I'm trying to be patient. Miles (talk) 03:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) When a Bureaucrat decides to close it. It sounds like a flippant response, I know, but it's accurate nevertheless; as per the policy, there is no time frame for RfA closure, and, regardless of how much/how little support a candidate has, the Bureaucrats are under no obligation to close it in what some might call a "timely fashion." – Defiant Elements 03:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it took CH around a week, and it took RJM a total of 2 DAYS! Cheezperson {talk}stuff 04:37, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Different administration. --Shadowcrest 15:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Very tru, it was a different time back then. The qualifications have certainly changed (in my opinion). Activity and all-around helpfulness should be the top 2 things people look at. To get back on subject, the wiki needs some helpful, active users, and they don't even have to be sysops! They can just be trusted people who other users can turn to in times of need. 05:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Different administration. --Shadowcrest 15:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it took CH around a week, and it took RJM a total of 2 DAYS! Cheezperson {talk}stuff 04:37, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
