Forum:Smash Arena Suggestions

Forums: Index → Smash Arena → Smash Arena Suggestions

NOTE: Suggestions are closed. You may vote on those already proposed but not new ones may be added.

This forum has the purpose of helping to select what battles will eventually take place in the Smash Arena. If you would like to make a suggestion, please feel free to leave it here. New suggestions are placed at the bottom of the page. Be sure to state your reason you suggested it and put the support, reject, and comments sections underneath it.

Like the idea? Be sure to give it your support. Note that this page is not to be used for the actual voting between fighters; that happens in the Arena itself. Remember, the combatants don't necessarily have to be able to fight each other normally in Smash Bros.

Rules

• The SA operator(s) has final say over all the fights. Suggestions and comments are merely a way for the community to influence the fights.
• Sign your suggestions/votes/comments with ~~~~ and a # in front of it (you don't necessarily have to put # in the comments sections, but you do have to sign with ~~~~).
• Don't vote for your own suggestion. You automatically vote for it if you suggest it.
• Do not post more than one suggestion at a time. Each user may post one suggestion per week.
• Post why you support/oppose. Don't just say, "Oh, this is a cool idea". Explain why you like/don't like the fight.
• You can remove your own suggestion, but it still counts as your suggestion for that week.
• Similarly to the above, you cannot edit a suggestion once people have started to vote on it. Editing the description is fine; just don't replace, add, or remove combatants.
• Place new suggestions at the bottom of the page. If you place them at the top, they may be lost.
• Do not use this page to argue with other users over their reasons and opinions. You can civilly point out an inconsistency or mistake in their description, but if you say things like, "That's stupid", that could potentially start an argument in the comments, you are breaching this rule.
• The comments section is to be used for relevant comments.
• Check this list to view the fights that have been done; currently no repeat fights are permitted.
• Suggestions are purged every time a new Smash Arena round is posted. It is at this time they are either accepted and placed into the queue, or they are rejected. Not all suggestions are purged at once.
• In the vein of the above, do not repost a suggestion of yours that has been removed, since it's either already lined up or been rejected. Reposting it after time has passed is generally a bad idea, since if it's already in the queue it's a waste of time, and if it was rejected the first time chances are it will remain that way. See the Queue section for an idea of how long it may take for your suggestion to show up.
• Only Smash Bros.-related fights are permitted. Fights don't have to be between playable characters, but the combatants must have appeared in at least one Smash Bros. game.
• Acceptance of fights is not based simply on votes. The votes are used to judge the community's opinion of the matchup; again it is solely the operator(s)'s decision on what the bouts are.
• If there are already 10 open suggestions, you should probably reconsider adding a new one. If there are 15, it is highly recommended you do not. There is no limit to the number of open suggestions, but having too many clutters the page and makes it more difficult to keep track of.
• And finally, do not make this page into the Smash Arena itself. This is for deciding what goes there, not voting on which would win.

Queue

The current queue is as such:

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

Hover the cursor over a round number to see its predicted start date. Empty spots are shown in grey.

When the queue becomes full (all the grey spots are filled up), suggestions will be suspended. You may continue to vote on current suggestions, but no more may be proposed. Once the queue drains out to a size of one, suggestions will be re-opened.

The queue is not set in stone; new suggestions may appear before older ones and it may change at any time. The queue is designed to attempt to balance out fights so that participants or universes aren't used too much in a short time.

The contents of the queue are a secret to maintain mystery and intrigue.

Show Your Support

	LADIES & GENTS! Come to the Smash Arena and vote on Round 132: Bayonetta vs. Sora!

Template:- {{SA Box}} - Smash Arena userbox; originally by Squallinoa 08, modified by Toomai. If you wish, place it on your user page. It will tell you the new fights as they happen.

Suggestions

Mushroom: Kingdom vs Flat Zone

Two Melee stages that are based on old Nintendo games.--Ratiosu (talk) 16:43, 26 April 2011 (EDT)

Support

1. 2d kinda68.197.115.28 20:04, 6 May 2011 (EDT)

Oppose

1. I don't see any similarities at all. Mushroom Kingdom is modernised, Flat zone is not. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 16:54, 26 April 2011 (EDT)
2. Mushroom Kingdom isn't as old as other stages in the game. MegaTron1XD 17:49, 26 April 2011 (EDT)
3. No. Mastersword (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
4. Not a big fan of stage fights. 110.174.90.69 02:53, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
5. Mushroom: Kingdom is more modernized than Flat Zone. --24.11.24.139 19:55, 29 April 2011 (EDT)

Comments

Hey, if anyone can get the time, can somebody remove my suggestion? Its not because everyone thinks its bad, just thought of a new suggestion.--Ratiosu (talk) 18:01, 26 April 2011 (EDT)

People are free to remove suggestions they have posted. However, you must still wait a week before posting another. Omega Tyrant 18:04, 26 April 2011 (EDT)

Olimar vs. Marth

According to Snake's codecs, Marth, while defending his kingdom, added defeated enemy soldies to his ranks. Olimar harvestes the remains of fallen foes to build his army. Both fought alongside their soldiers for their cause, although Marth's sword is stronger than Olimar's punch. Pitting these two leaders against each other, who will be victorious? Jelloratbob (talk) 21:02, 26 April 2011 (EDT)

Support

1. The 2-D RPG guy vs the 3d action game guy! Mr. Anon (talk) 22:41, 26 April 2011 (EDT)
2. Description is good. Omega Tyrant 19:23, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
3. Two military leaders. Why not? Although, I will point out that Olimar brings his troops in to battle in Brawl, but Marth doesn't. I'm still supporting this though. Fuddlebob (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2011 (EDT)
4. Might as well. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 15:28, 28 April 2011 (EDT)
5. I like the idea of military leaders battling it out. Could also work with a few of the other characters. 110.174.90.69 02:53, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
6. I LOVE these dudesLuke5176 (talk) 10:00, 1 May 2011 (EDT)

Oppose

1. Sorry, but no. Mastersword (talk) 03:01, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
2. The two have nothing (or almost nothing) in common. --24.11.24.139 16:37, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
3. What?--Wolf rulez! Playtime's over! 13:33, 29 April 2011 (EDT)

Comments

You'll have to actually check the original Fire Emblem for those facts about Marth, rather than use Snake's Codec (which has been wrong at times) as a source. Not necessarily saying the Codec is wrong (as I haven't played FE), but you should do research before making claims of comparison. Mr. Anon (talk) 21:38, 26 April 2011 (EDT)

In all Fire Emblem games, there are recruitable characters that are enemies during the battles you recruit them in. Omega Tyrant 22:04, 26 April 2011 (EDT)

OK then. Thanks! Mr. Anon (talk) 22:41, 26 April 2011 (EDT)

Pig King Statue vs. Porky

Porky vs. Porky. Which form is better?68.197.115.28 16:28, 27 April 2011 (EDT)

Support

1. This is actually a pretty good suggestion. For those of you who haven't played Earthbound or Mother 3, this fight represents a battle between the Porky from the former and the Porky from the latter. Mr. Anon (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2011 (EDT)

Oppose

1. I'm just not liking it. MegaTron1XD 16:52, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
2. Again: what?--Wolf rulez! Playtime's over! 13:33, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
3. Per Shaun's Wiji Dodo's comment. --24.11.24.139 19:23, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
4. Pig King Statue doesn't make much of an appearance Mastersword (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2011 (EDT)

Comments

@Anon, have you forgot who is who? The Pig King statue is the undefeatable statue that has 1,000,000hp and you need a new years eve bomb to destroy it. And Porky, seeing that his name is "Porky" and not "Pokey" would mean it would be the Porky from mother 3, there is no earthbound in this, there is just an undefeatable statue vs an obnoxious kid in a giant spider mech.--Shaun's Wiji Dodo talk 21:57, 27 April 2011 (EDT)

Throughout Mother 3, Porky attempts to hide the fact that he has aged impossibly by having all of his idols in New Pork City appear as younger Porky/ Pokey. The Porky Statue is one of these idols, and thus I consider him as (one of) the reference to Earthbound Porky in Mother 3. Mr. Anon (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2011 (EDT)

There isn't a difference to Porky really, apart from the blonde to grey hair and worn out clothes porky looks the same especially when its a statue of just grey colour.--Shaun's Wiji Dodo talk 23:21, 27 April 2011 (EDT)

No. The fact that Porky attempts to make himself young through his public image is a significant part of Mother 3. He specifically mentions "I'm still that old kid inside", referencing his Earthbound appearance. The statue, along with all his other idols in New Pork City, appear similar to his Earthbound appearance. Mr. Anon (talk) 00:01, 28 April 2011 (EDT)

What other idols? The Pig King statue isn't a reference to earthbound, it is just a symbol of how he is still immature, hence the slingshot and book it carries which are not in earthbound.--Shaun's Wiji Dodo talk 01:41, 28 April 2011 (EDT)

Ridley vs. Meta Ridley

Ridley battles himself! Who do YOU like?Luke5176 (talk) 16:41, 27 April 2011 (EDT) 16:38, 27 April 2011 (EDT)

Support

1. Inb4ohthisisafightbetweenthesamecharacteritsucks! Seriously, this isn't at all like the Hammer vs. Golden Hammer matchup, as one version is not completely superior to the other. I would be very interested in seeing which form of Ridley is seen as superior by the SmashWiki community. Omega Tyrant 19:23, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
2. Per reason above. Mr. Anon (talk) 21:20, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
3. Per the vote above me. --24.11.24.139 19:56, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
4. Mighty dragons of recreationsLucas-IV- Paper Tosser 09:21, 30 April 2011 (EDT)
5. YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Mastersword (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2011 (EDT)
6. Obvious answer, but good.68.197.115.28 20:05, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
7. Eh, this might be working. They battle tactics also different, anyways. 206.53.152.103 06:25, 7 May 2011 (EDT)

Oppose

1. Suggested before, and failed before. MegaTron1XD 16:52, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
2. Didya read the Hammer vs. Golden Hammer fight? "Urm... This reminds me of the Ridley vs. Meta Ridley suggestion... ☆The Solar Dragon☆"-Ivy73 18:44, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
3. Fighting another version of yourself is pointless, especially if it is a stronger version of yourself. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 01:24, 28 April 2011 (EDT)
4. Its imposable. ..... My life for hire! 17:38, 28 April 2011 (EDT)
5. This battle seems kind of one-sided. 110.174.90.69 02:53, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
6. Ridley = Meta Ridley.--Wolf rulez! Playtime's over! 13:33, 29 April 2011 (EDT)

Comments

@Megatron1: A failed suggestion can be resuggested, so this suggestion can be made. Omega Tyrant 17:50, 27 April 2011 (EDT)

Heck, i once suggest a 'once failed' suggestion too, but at the end i got a lot of supportsLucas-IV- Paper Tosser 09:21, 30 April 2011 (EDT)

Which suggestion was that? Mastersword (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2011 (EDT)

yoshi vs luigi, well not all-supports, but it ended up on the smash arena anyway Lucas-IV- Paper Tosser 08:12, 2 May 2011 (EDT)

Yeouch! This is a close battle! --24.11.24.139 16:22, 2 May 2011 (EDT)

This isn't a battle. It's a suggestion for a battle. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 17:03, 2 May 2011 (EDT)

Oh, I meant suggestion. :P --24.11.24.139 16:07, 3 May 2011 (EDT)

Munchlax vs. Gulpin

Think about it. They are both Pokemon, both eat stuff, and both appear in Brawl! Who wins: the Pokemon that eats items, or the Pokemon that eats characters? BTW this is my first suggestion, so this might get hit with opposes. 24.11.24.139 16:45, 27 April 2011 (EDT)

Support

1. Munchlax can help at times, so I guess this would work. MegaTron1XD 16:52, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
2. nice68.197.115.28 17:25, 27 April 2011 (EDT)
3. They both eat things, although I hate that Munchlax. Eat my assist trophy you evil little... Saving it for the SA :P ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 15:28, 28 April 2011 (EDT)
4. Interesting idea. Would make for a cool fight. 110.174.90.69 02:53, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
5. They both eat stuff!--Wolf rulez! Playtime's over! 13:33, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
6. Yeah, this could work. Fuddlebob (talk) 06:41, 30 April 2011 (EDT)
7. Both can be annoying, like when you are heading to an Assist trophy, can be like Munhlax eat the Assist trophy, or Gulpin eats YOULucas-IV- Paper Tosser 09:21, 30 April 2011 (EDT)
8. They're both greedy pokemon who are both annoying. Mastersword (talk) 21:09, 30 April 2011 (EDT)

Oppose

1. Just no! I just simply don't like this fight! And for the third time, what? And I'm just not a big fan of these fights. Mr. Anon (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2011 (EDT)

Comments

@Mr. Anon: What? I'm not really getting what you say. Why don't you just ignore those, and possibly the whole Smash Arena if you don't like the fights given? --24.11.24.139 07:28, 7 May 2011 (EDT)