SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Enigmatic Mr. L

Request passed

Enigmatic Mr. L

I'v been editing this wikia for about 3/4 of a year, so I do know some things about wikia tools. I am a very active contributor here (I contribute just about everyday as long as I can get to a working computer) who frequently patrols the recent changes (so I know when vandalism strikes). The number of my edits that were undoing vandalism exceeds 30. I am aware that because of Smashwiki:Assume good faith, I should only revert/undo edits when I'm positive they are vandalism. The best example of me explaining a revert that many wouldn't have bothered explaining is here [[1]]. As far as I know, these are the only qualifiactions for becoming a rollbacker (isn't a vandal, active, fights vandalsim, assumes good faith, etc. ), but correct me if I'm wrong. Enigmatic Mr. L 18:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Votes/Comments

• Support - I took a quick look at your contributions and as you said, you have a decent amount of reverts, which is good enough for me. Y462 (T • C • E ) 20:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

• Support, not only is Mr. L aware of the problems of using rollback incorrectly (which most of the other users are not), he's very active and has reverted many times in the past. No reason not to pass. Shadowcrest 21:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

• Support. EML is actively reverting vandalism, which is the main requirement here. Miles (talk) 22:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Pikamander's famous rule.L33t Silvie ^{I see wat u did thar...}