Template talk:Violation

Edit

Punishment should depend on the severity of the action, like you wouldn't block a guy just for abusing the talk pages. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 03:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to edit it as you feel it should be. If it is agreed on, it will stay, if not, there will continuing edits.UP/T/O 03:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I would suggest that we remove the part saying they'll get a second warning; if they continue to violate the same policy after one warning, the assumtion is that they have read it and ignored it, and I trust the sysops will use personal discretion on whether or not the offense is bannable. --Shadowcrest 03:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

My first idea on this subject was to create warnings based on certain types of violations, but I realized that that would require lots of templates. This template idea necessary, as the only warning template we have (mainspace vandalism) wouldn't be appropriate if a user continuously PA's other users. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 03:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah forget what I said, SC hit the nail on the head, but we need to figure out which actions qualify for blocks, and how long those blocks are. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 03:13, 26 December 2008 (UTC)