Talk:NONE

What's the code? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.153.169 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

Merge

There is only one case in which it would be reasonable to have each debug-related subject (such as NONE) on its own page, which would be that there was so much to write about each subject that, if they were all covered in the debug menu article, the resulting page would be inconveniently long. This, however, is not the case. PenguinofDeath 06:53, 21 October 2011 (EDT)

Seeing as every character has its own seperate article, and "NONE" being kind of a character (although not playable), I would say keep. On another note, this is an odd case anyway, also a reason to keep it imo.-- PSIWolf ^{The one and only!} 11:23, 24 August 2012 (EDT)

Meaning it can go in Category:Unplayable characters. Besides, there's a lot of debug menu-related separate articles on this wiki, might as well stay separate. Toast ltimatum 11:25, 24 August 2012 (EDT)

I oppose the merge. ScoreCounter (talk) 12:44, 5 September 2012 (EDT)

I oppose too. --RoyboyX Talk 09:51, 29 September 2012 (EDT)

opposed Thomasgamer4000 12:05, October 7, 2019 (EDT)

Don't respond to years-old discussions, please. Aidan, the Spooky Rurouni 12:07, October 7, 2019 (EDT)

Use

Does anyone think NONE could have been a character template? Just throwing that out there. Planterobloon (talk) 13:39, 16 November 2013 (EST)

No. Scr7(talk · contribs) 13:44, 16 November 2013 (EST)

None's identity

Does anyone think that maybe Sakurai intended for Sheik to be a seperate playable character like she is in SSB4? I mean, NONE could be what Sheik used to be. That could be why NONE settles on Sheik (for a name, I mean) Harro (talk) 20:36, 21 June 2014 (EDT)

Something akin to "none" has to exist, so I think it's very unlikely that it's a leftover in that sense. Toomai Glittershine The Altruistic 20:54, 21 June 2014 (EDT)